SEC Staff Emails Reveal XRP Failed Howey Test, Questioning SEC’s Allegations

TL;DR Breakdown

  • Newly revealed SEC staff emails suggest that Ripple’s XRP may not meet the criteria to be considered a security, contradicting the SEC’s allegations.
  • The court’s decision to make documents related to the Hinman Speech public could provide insights into why Ether was classified as a non-security

In a dramatic twist to the ongoing legal battle between Ripple Labs and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), newly revealed SEC staff emails have raised questions about the regulatory agency’s allegations against Ripple’s XRP cryptocurrency. Attorney John Deaton, who represents XRP holders, brought attention to a footnote in Ripple’s court briefs, which suggests that XRP may not satisfy the Howey Test and, therefore, should not be considered a security. 

The revelation has sparked concerns about the SEC’s actions and their alignment with their own staff’s analysis. Additionally, the court’s decision to reject the SEC’s motion to seal documents related to the Hinman Speech has heightened anticipation within the cryptocurrency industry, as these memos could provide insights into why Ether (ETH) was deemed not to be a security.

Footnote Raises Doubts on XRP’s Security Status

Attorney John Deaton’s intervention in the Ripple lawsuit has brought attention to a significant footnote within Ripple’s opposition and reply briefs submitted to the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York. The footnote suggests that there are reasonable grounds to conclude that XRP does not meet all the elements of the Howey Test, which is used to determine whether an asset qualifies as a security under federal securities law. 

This development challenges the SEC’s position that XRP is a security and raises concerns about why the agency pursued charges against Ripple executives despite its own staff analyzing XRP as not meeting the criteria for security. The attorney further points out that an exhibit from SEC emails, numbered 230, indicates that it is “more likely than not” that XRP will not be considered a security and, therefore, should not be subject to regulatory oversight by the SEC. The exhibit in question, part of the SEC emails, contradicts the charges brought against Ripple. 

Moreover, Deaton highlights that the SEC’s enforcement lawyers had analyzed XRP back in June 2018 but did not recommend any enforcement action, including issuing a cease and desist letter to halt XRP trading. These revelations raise crucial questions about the SEC’s decision-making process and the consistency of its actions regarding XRP.

Court Rejects SEC’s Attempt to Seal Hinman Speech Documents

In another significant development, the U.S. District Court rejected the SEC’s motion to seal documents and emails related to the infamous Hinman Speech. Former SEC Director of Corporation Finance, Bill Hinman, delivered the speech in 2018, stating that Ether (ETH), the native cryptocurrency of the Ethereum network, should not be considered a security. The court’s decision means that these documents will soon be available to the public, offering insights into the SEC’s reasoning behind Hinman’s classification of Ether.

The exposure of the Hinman Speech memos is highly anticipated within the cryptocurrency industry. This transparency will not only provide clarity on the SEC’s perspective regarding Ether but may also guide market participants and regulators in understanding the SEC’s approach to determining whether a cryptocurrency should be classified as a security. The outcome of this disclosure could have far-reaching implications for the crypto industry, shaping future regulatory decisions and offering precedent for other cryptocurrencies seeking legal clarity.

Conclusion

The ongoing Ripple lawsuit takes a surprising turn with the revelation of SEC staff emails suggesting that Ripple’s XRP cryptocurrency did not meet the criteria to be classified as a security under the Howey Test. Attorney John Deaton’s highlighting of a footnote in Ripple’s court briefs challenges the SEC’s allegations and raises questions about the regulatory agency’s actions.

Disclaimer. The information provided is not trading advice. Cryptopolitan.com holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decisions.

文章来源于互联网:SEC Staff Emails Reveal XRP Failed Howey Test, Questioning SEC’s Allegations

Disclaimers:

1. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions and this info is not liable for any losses you may incur.

2. The copyright of this article belongs to the writer, it represents the writer's opinions only, not represents the site's ones. Not financial advice.

Previous 2023年5月22日 12:09
Next 2023年5月22日 12:44

Related articles

  • Supercharged Liquidity Pools on Osmosis: Empowering Liquidity Providers for Enhanced Rewards

    TL;DR Breakdown Osmosis approves supercharged liquidity pools, enabling liquidity providers to concentrate assets within specific ranges and gain higher rewards based on actual liquidity usage. A gradual migration process will be followed, starting with the deployment of a DAI/OSMO supercharged pool and subsequent migrations of classic curve pools. Description In a significant development for the Osmosis ecosystem, the community has successfully authorized the deployment of supercharged liquidity pools. These pools aim to provide liquidity providers with the ability to concentrate their assets within specific ranges, offering an opportunity to maximize rewards. The introduction of concentrated liquidity pools marks a shift towards a more efficient … Read more In a significant development for the Osmosis ecosystem, the community has successfully authorized the deployment of supercharged liquidity pools. These pools aim to provide liquidity providers with the ability to concentrate their assets within specific ranges, offering an opportunity to maximize rewards. The introduction of concentrated liquidity pools marks a shift towards a more efficient allocation of incentives based on actual liquidity usage, as opposed to the previous system of evenly distributed rewards….

    Article 2023年6月23日
  • Swiss authorities freeze $26 million in crypto funds tied to Terraform Labs executives

    TL;DR Breakdown Swiss prosecutors freeze $26 million in crypto funds of Terraform Labs executives following requests from U.S. authorities. The frozen assets are part of an investigation into fraud and securities violations linked to Terraform Labs’ collapsed project. Founder Kwon Do-hyeong and former CFO Han Chang-joon face legal troubles, with recent sentencing in Montenegro and extradition sought by South Korean authorities. Description Swiss authorities have taken a significant step in the ongoing investigation into Terraform Labs and its top executives by freezing approximately $26 million in cryptocurrency funds. Following requests from U.S. federal prosecutors in New York and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the move highlights the international cooperation in pursuing allegations of fraud and securities … Read more Swiss authorities have taken a significant step in the ongoing investigation into Terraform Labs and its top executives by freezing approximately $26 million in cryptocurrency funds. Following requests from U.S. federal prosecutors in New York and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the move highlights the international cooperation in pursuing allegations of fraud and securities law violations. Allegations of wrongdoing…

    Article 2023年6月29日
  • Crypto exchange Bittrex faces potential lawsuit in Florida

    TL;DR Breakdown The Florida Office of Financial Regulation (OFR) is contemplating taking action against Bittrex, a cryptocurrency exchange based in the United States. On April 17, the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) filed a complaint against the exchange.  Bittrex surrendered its Florida money transmitter license on April 30, and on May 8, the exchange filed for bankruptcy.  Description The Florida Office of Financial Regulation (OFR) is contemplating taking action against Bittrex, a cryptocurrency exchange based in the United States, which recently filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. The OFR’s assistant general counsel, Brandon Greenberg, stated in a filing with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware on July 5 that the … Read more The Florida Office of Financial Regulation (OFR) is contemplating taking action against Bittrex, a cryptocurrency exchange based in the United States, which recently filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection. The OFR’s assistant general counsel, Brandon Greenberg, stated in a filing with the U.S. Bankruptcy Court for the District of Delaware on July 5 that the state regulator had received information about Bittrex’s alleged…

    Article 2023年7月8日
  • Japan’s new crypto regulations, what you need to know before June 1st

    TL;DR Breakdown The Japanese parliament has recently decided to implement stricter Anti-Money Laundering (AML) measures starting from June 1st. The G7 Committee, which met in Japan in mid-May, expressed support for the Travel Rule and emphasized the importance of global standards for cryptocurrencies. The Travel Rule requires financial institutions processing cryptocurrency transfers exceeding $3,000 to provide recipient exchanges or institutions with customer information. The Japanese parliament has recently decided to implement stricter Anti-Money Laundering (AML) measures starting from June 1st. This move comes as a response to the international financial watchdog, the Financial Action Task Force (FATF), deeming Japan’s previous AML legislation insufficient. The aim is to align Japan’s legal framework with global cryptocurrency regulations. One of the key features of the new measures is the enforcement of the “Travel Rule” in order to enhance the tracking of criminal proceeds. The Travel Rule requires financial institutions processing cryptocurrency transfers exceeding $3,000 to provide recipient exchanges or institutions with customer information. This information includes the name, address, and account details of both the sender and recipient. The G7 Committee, which met…

    Article 2023年5月25日
  • Stablecoins pose lower risk than bank deposits says former Fed policy analyst

    TL;DR Breakdown Stablecoins are argued to present lower risks than traditional bank deposits due to differences in reserve assets and maturity transformation practices. The distinct purpose of stablecoins, primarily as a means of payment, sets them apart from money market funds and warrants tailored regulatory approaches. Implementing rigid bank-like oversight on stablecoin issuers might hinder competition and empower a select few market participants. Description A recent policy paper authored by Brendan Malone, a former Federal Reserve Board analyst representing Paradigm, a technology investment firm, sheds light on the comparative risks of stablecoins against traditional bank deposits and money market funds. The paper explores the potential risks that stablecoins might pose to the financial system, particularly in the context of … Read more A recent policy paper authored by Brendan Malone, a former Federal Reserve Board analyst representing Paradigm, a technology investment firm, sheds light on the comparative risks of stablecoins against traditional bank deposits and money market funds. The paper explores the potential risks that stablecoins might pose to the financial system, particularly in the context of ongoing legislative proposals…

    Article 2023年7月29日
TOP