Vitalik Buterin calls DFINITY Ethereum’s sister network – EDCON 2023

TL;DR Breakdown

  • Vitalik Buterin, co-founder of Ethereum, emphasized the close functionality between Ethereum and DFINITY by referring to DFINITY as Ethereum’s sister network.
  • Buterin’s statement suggests that Ethereum and DFINITY are designed to work together and complement each other. While Ethereum remains a leading blockchain platform, DFINITY offers unique features and capabilities that enhance the overall blockchain ecosystem.
  • The mention of DFINITY as Ethereum’s sister network highlights the importance of scalability for blockchain networks. Both Ethereum and DFINITY are actively working on scaling solutions to address the limitations of current blockchain technology and enable mass adoption.

During the EDCON 2023 conference, Vitalik Buterin called the The Internet Computernetwork Ethereum’s sister network refuting competition claims. In the world of blockchain technology and crypto, Ethereum has emerged as a prominent player, revolutionizing the way we think about decentralized applications and smart contracts. 

However, another platform has recently gained significant attention in the crypto community, positioning itself as Ethereum’s sister network: the DFINITY project. DFINITY is a groundbreaking blockchain platform that aims to provide a highly scalable and efficient decentralized computing network. Created by a team of visionary developers, DFINITY offers a unique approach to blockchain technology.

Vitalik sees DFINITY as Ethereum’s sister network rather than a competition

Ethereum and DFINITY both strive to create a decentralized future, empowering individuals and businesses with the ability to interact directly, securely, and without intermediaries. While Ethereum has established itself as a leader in the field, DFINITY aims to complement its capabilities by addressing some of the scalability challenges that Ethereum currently faces.

When it comes to Layer 1s that allow smart contracts, Ethereum is without a doubt the most popular. With a market valuation of approximately 216 billion dollars and 70 billion dollars in multiple DeFi protocols, Ethereum’s success has surely given door to many technical advances that other cryptocurrencies employ today.

DFINITY, the future public blockchain-based cloud computing network that will seed a decentralized internet known as cloud 3.0. It is also completely compatible with the Ethereum Virtual Machine (EVM) and significantly reduces the cost of IT systems and business applications.

It’s incredible that DFINITY’s “Blockchain Nervous System” can mechanically adjust economic conditions as well as specific network settings to suit capacity needs. In brief, this network can evolve and address real-time issues, making it far more adaptable than present systems.

DFINITY vs Ethereum VS

Ethereum is unquestionably the dominant decentralized public blockchain platform for running smart contracts. The Ethereum smart contract and EVM components added credibility to the technology. In addition, it possesses all the fundamental advantages that the conventional blockchain lacks. Here are the top 5 differences between Ethereum and Dfinity.

1. On-chain governance VS off-chain governance – The The Internet Computer BNS is a built-in on-chain governance structure, whereas Ethereum discussions and decisions must be conducted off-chain.

2. Proof of Stake (PoS) VS Proof of Work (PoW) – PoW is the requirement that block creators solve cryptographic riddles to earn the right to create a new block. PoS is a system that allows you to become the next bookmaker based on the stake fraction you own or deposit into the system.

In comparison to PoS, the PoW system requires more costly computations. Therefore, individuals produce evidence of their stake, which DFINITY will use. In certain circumstances, Ethereum uses both the PoW and the PoS. Note that Ethereum has transitioned to PoS.

3. Security over Lifeness VS Lifeness over Security – Typically, DFINITY is so-called threshold groups, in which a random selection of 400 IDs manifest blocks and generate unique threshold signatures. When the threshold is not met, the entire system fails. In such circumstances, Ethereum takes a different approach using the proof of work architecture, which prioritizes life over security. The The Internet Computer, on the other hand, favors security over lifeness.

4. Fixed-sized deposits VS variably sized deposits – There is a fixed sized deposit at DFINITY where the quantity of stake that you must deposit is fixed by the system and there is a requirement to create more than one ID. There are variously sized deposits in Ethereum where you can design the system with diverse affects.

As a result, in the never-ending war between The Internet Computer and Ethereum, both win according to different standards. It is also important to note that both are roughly equivalent in terms of their distinct individual characteristics.

5. Actor model VS serialized contract execution – DFINITY, in general, follows the Actor Model because it allows for the execution of applications. This represents the fact that it provides both parallel contract execution and asynchronous message passing. On the other side, everything happens on Ethereum one after the other, and you need to store a lot of data in your memory, which puts a pressure on your machine’s memory.

Disclaimer. The information provided is not trading advice. Cryptopolitan.com holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decision.

文章来源于互联网:Vitalik Buterin calls DFINITY Ethereum’s sister network – EDCON 2023

Disclaimers:

1. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions and this info is not liable for any losses you may incur.

2. The copyright of this article belongs to the writer, it represents the writer's opinions only, not represents the site's ones. Not financial advice.

Previous 2023年5月26日 12:53
Next 2023年5月26日 14:25

Related articles

  • Blue Chip NFTs drive lending market to over $430 million: Report

    TL;DR Breakdown The NFT lending market has reached over $430 million in loans across 43,521 borrowers, with blue chip NFT collections dominating as collateral. Paraspace and BitKeep report $25 million in outstanding NFT loans added from January to March, fueled by the launch of Blur and the rise of Bitcoin Ordinals. Liquidity challenges persist in the NFT market due to limited user numbers, pricing difficulties, and high NFT prices, but Paraspace’s strict collateral rules have led to successful loan management. The market for borrowing and lending non-fungible tokens (NFTs), known as NFTFi loans, has surpassed $430 million across 43,521 borrowers, according to a report by Paraspace, a non-fungible token money market protocol, and BitKeep, a multichain wallet. The majority of collateral in these loans consists of the most popular NFT collections, including Wrapped CryptoPunks, Bored Ape Yacht Club, and Mutant Ape Yacht Club. Research conducted by Paraspace and BitKeep reveals that the outstanding loans in the NFTFi market increased by $25 million between January and March. The launch of Blur, a digital collectible lending protocol by NFT marketplace Blur, also…

    Article 2023年6月10日
  • Goldman Sachs and Apple pull the plug on trading app

    TL;DR Breakdown Apple and Goldman Sachs have abandoned their plan to release a futures trading app. The app, initially scheduled for 2022, was halted due to economic concerns such as rising interest rates and inflation. The infrastructure for the app was mostly complete, with ambiguity surrounding the inclusion of crypto futures trading. Description An anticipated collaborative effort between tech behemoth Apple and financial powerhouse Goldman Sachs on a futures trading application has fizzled out. The venture, initially pegged for a 2022 debut, faced suspension amidst a challenging economic landscape characterized by rising interest rates and burgeoning inflationary pressures, making riskier assets less appealing. A Partnership Marred by Economic … Read more An anticipated collaborative effort between tech behemoth Apple and financial powerhouse Goldman Sachs on a futures trading application has fizzled out. The venture, initially pegged for a 2022 debut, faced suspension amidst a challenging economic landscape characterized by rising interest rates and burgeoning inflationary pressures, making riskier assets less appealing. A Partnership Marred by Economic Uncertainties The groundwork for this ambitious project had been substantially laid out, with the…

    Article 2023年9月21日
  • EtherFi condemns OpenSea for silently suspending EtherFan NFTs

    TL;DR Breakdown EtherFi has published an open letter criticizing OpenSea for suspending EtherFan NFs without notifying them despite co-working on the launch In what EtherFi said was “a templated response,” OpenSea said its actions were directed towards enforcing its terms of service Description EtherFi, a liquid staking protocol, has published an open letter criticizing OpenSea. Last week, the company’s EtherFan collection of NFTs backed by staked ETH was abruptly removed from the NFT marketplace. The two had been working together on the EtherFan debut for weeks to release the collection, with an advertising plan based on cross-promotion and … Read more EtherFi, a liquid staking protocol, has published an open letter criticizing OpenSea. Last week, the company’s EtherFan collection of NFTs backed by staked ETH was abruptly removed from the NFT marketplace. The two had been working together on the EtherFan debut for weeks to release the collection, with an advertising plan based on cross-promotion and sales on the secondary market. Mike Silagadze, the founder of EtherFi, mentioned in the letter that OpenSea appeared positive and interested in the partnership…

    Article 2023年7月20日
  • The hidden dangers of CBDCs for central banks

    TL;DR Breakdown Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs) present both opportunities and challenges for central banks. CBDCs could be programmed for specific uses, boosting economic impact. Risks include the creation of secondary markets and a large-scale shift from bank deposits to CBDC wallets. Description As the world accelerates towards a cashless society, central banks globally are gearing up to introduce their own retail central bank digital currencies, commonly referred to as CBDCs. These digital tokens hold the promise of multiple benefits compared to traditional cash. However, there are undeniable risks and potential pitfalls that could jeopardize the integrity of … Read more As the world accelerates towards a cashless society, central banks globally are gearing up to introduce their own retail central bank digital currencies, commonly referred to as CBDCs. These digital tokens hold the promise of multiple benefits compared to traditional cash. However, there are undeniable risks and potential pitfalls that could jeopardize the integrity of the very institutions that create them. Advancements and intricacies of CBDCs The evolution of digital currencies presents opportunities and challenges for central banks, notably…

    Article 2023年7月24日
  • House Committee hearing talks crypto regulation

    TL;DR Breakdown Rep. Mike Flood questions Prometheum CEO, Aaron Kaplan, on evolving clarity over digital asset securities in a recent hearing. Flood presses Kaplan on Prometheum’s inability to support Ether and Bitcoin trading. Kaplan cites recent SEC actions and statements that provide clarity, arguing against the need for new legislation. Navigating the complex world of digital assets and the emerging regulatory landscape, a U.S. House Committee hearing on June 14 had Representative Mike Flood of Nebraska hold a riveting discourse with crypto marketplace Prometheum’s CEO, Aaron Kaplan. The crux of the dialogue circled around defining the landscape of digital asset securities and their regulatory frameworks. The pendulum of clarity At the center of the dialogue was the exchange between Flood and Kaplan regarding the evolving clarity over the definition of digital asset securities. The correspondence between Prometheum and the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), back in December 2020, revealed Prometheum’s concerns over the lack of regulatory clarity. The company worried that the ambiguity could potentially disrupt the registration process for broker-dealers who need to distinguish between digital assets and digital…

    Article 2023年6月17日
TOP