Crypto industry unites as SEC targets Binance and Coinbase

TL;DR Breakdown

  • SEC files lawsuits against Binance and Coinbase, sparking industry backlash.
  • Professionals criticize the agency’s overreach and unclear regulations.
  • The agency’s actions might push crypto firms towards more crypto-friendly jurisdictions.

Turbulence has engulfed the crypto world, as the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has taken the surprising action of launching lawsuits against Binance and Coinbase, two of the largest cryptocurrency exchanges globally.

This sudden move has sparked widespread reaction from industry insiders, raising concerns about the impact these actions may have on crypto innovation in the United States.

Industry Insiders React to SEC’s Actions

On one hand, there is palpable frustration from industry professionals who are witnessing what they see as an overstep from the SEC. Kristin Smith, CEO of the Blockchain Association, described the agency’s approach as unacceptable, emphasizing that they do not make the law.

She pointed out that these measures distract from substantive policy efforts as the industry and Congress work towards effective regulation. Smith expressed concern that the SEC is trying to circumvent formal processes and prevent public engagement by listing assets this way.

Stablecoin issuer Tether’s CTO, Paolo Ardoino, mirrored Smith’s sentiments, arguing that these complaints against the SEC should be taken seriously. He noted the increasing uncertainty around rules and guidance in the U.S., a concern that even staunch crypto supporters are echoing.

Ted Shao, CEO of Turbos Finance, took the criticism a step further, declaring that this is not the direction that developers in the Web3 space want to see.

He conveyed his belief that the SEC is not only attacking centralized exchanges but the entire Web3 space, citing their actions against leading projects.

Implications for Crypto Companies and Consumers

While these lawsuits have sparked strong reactions from industry insiders, they also have real implications for both companies and consumers.

Some industry professionals believe these moves might push crypto players towards more crypto-friendly jurisdictions, potentially damaging consumer confidence in crypto within the United States.

Insider Intelligence crypto analyst, Will Paige, expressed concerns that these lawsuits could further weaken already fragile consumer confidence in cryptocurrencies. Paige attributes this to the SEC’s demonstrated intent to police the space through enforcement, given the lack of a regulatory framework.

Ben Caselin, Chief Strategy Officer at crypto exchange MaskEX, suggested that these cases, though currently against Binance, could potentially impact other players in the U.S. He noted that this may present opportunities for jurisdictions like Hong Kong, Dubai, and even El Salvador to drive innovation and attract capital and talent.

Calls for Clear Regulations and Criticism of Enforcement Methods

While some industry professionals focused on potential outcomes, others explored the fairness and motivation behind the SEC’s move.

David Schwed, COO of Blockchain security firm Halborn, highlighted the SEC’s mandate to safeguard investors, which he believes can be achieved through clear regulations, not enforcement actions.

Alex Strześniewski, the founder of the decentralized finance protocol AngelBlock, branded the agency’s actions as lazy, arguing that such actions do not advance proper regulation.

On a similar note, Tim Shan, COO at decentralized exchange Dexalot, expressed that the SEC’s actions are unfair to the community, criticizing their approach of regulating through the courts rather than providing clarity and guidance.

Despite the turbulence, the industry is bracing for impact. Stephan Lutz, CEO of crypto trading platform BitMEX, provided insights into the potential effects of the SEC’s crackdown on exchanges.

He noted short-term downward pressure on crypto stock prices, altcoins, and valuations of U.S.-based crypto startups. But in the long run, Lutz believes that exchanges will be more cautious when dealing with U.S. customers and providing access to what the agency claims are securities.

He expressed frustration over regulators taking the issue of securities definition to the courthouse, rather than providing clear guidelines.

Disclaimer: The information provided is not trading advice. Cryptopolitan.com holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decision.

文章来源于互联网:Crypto industry unites as SEC targets Binance and Coinbase

Disclaimers:

1. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions and this info is not liable for any losses you may incur.

2. The copyright of this article belongs to the writer, it represents the writer's opinions only, not represents the site's ones. Not financial advice.

Previous 2023年6月12日 21:40
Next 2023年6月12日 23:07

Related articles

  • Pro-XRP lawyer tips Ripple’s triumph over SEC at less than 3%

    TL;DR Breakdown Pro-Ripple attorney John Deaton predicts that the SEC’s chances of succeeding in its legal battle against Ripple are less than 3%.   The Hinman docs are being closely watched by the Ripple community as they could serve as XRP’s last hope. The court ruling on whether XRP is a security, or a commodity is likely to be rendered by September 30 of this year. According to pro-Ripple attorney John Deaton, the Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) chances of succeeding in its legal battle against Ripple are less than 3%. According to the attorney, Ripple has a 25% chance of outright victory over the SEC and a 50% chance of winning by “splitting the baby.” The verdict rendered by Judge Torres may have a significant effect on the classification of XRP as well as the entire crypto market. The deadline for a decision is September 30. Judge Torres to decide XRP’s classification: Security or Commodity? The SEC has been litigating Ripple because of the alleged sale of unregistered securities, XRP, since December 2020. The attorney estimates that there is a…

    Article 2023年6月10日
  • Curve emergency DAO halts hack-related token rewards

    TL;DR Breakdown Curve Finance has terminated governance token rewards for certain liquidity pools. The affected pools include alETH+ETH, msETH-ETH, pETH-ETH, crvCRVETH, Arbitrum Tricrypto, and multibtc3CRV. It is important to note that the decision can be reversed in the future if the Curve DAO conducts a full vote. Description The Curve Finance lending protocol has recently taken significant steps to address the vulnerabilities and exploits it faced in July. In response to the July 30 Curve exploit and the July 6 Multichain exploit, the protocol has terminated governance token rewards for certain liquidity pools. This decision was made public on August 2 by a … Read more The Curve Finance lending protocol has recently taken significant steps to address the vulnerabilities and exploits it faced in July. In response to the July 30 Curve exploit and the July 6 Multichain exploit, the protocol has terminated governance token rewards for certain liquidity pools. This decision was made public on August 2 by a member of the protocol’s governing body, Gabriel Shapiro. The termination of rewards was carried out by the Curve Emergency…

    Article 2023年8月3日
  • FTX objects to extended settlement talks with bankrupt crypto lender Genesis

    TL;DR Breakdown FTX and its affiliates object to extending settlement talks with bankrupt crypto lender Genesis, causing delays in the resolution process. Genesis’ bankruptcy proceedings face challenges due to delays, lawsuits, and objections from creditors, including FTX, the largest creditor with claims worth $3.9 billion. Sam Bankman-Fried, founder of FTX, seeks to shift blame to a law firm in his defense against fraud charges, while FTX debtors challenge Genesis’ recovery plans and request relief from the stay. In a recent court filing, FTX and its affiliates objected to the extension of court-mediated settlement talks involving bankrupt crypto lender Genesis. Despite being a major creditor, FTX claimed that it had not been invited to the court-appointed mediation in May. Genesis had filed a motion estimating FTX debtors’ claims at $0.00, but FTX, stating that it was the largest creditor with claims worth $3.9 billion, opposed this motion. The objections from FTX and other individual Genesis creditors have caused delays in the settlement attempts, frustrating the resolution process. Genesis bankruptcy proceedings marred by delays and lawsuits Genesis, once a prominent provider of…

    Article 2023年6月8日
  • Robert F. Kennedy Jr. criticizes SEC’s approach to crypto regulation, calls for change

    TL;DR Breakdown Robert F. Kennedy Jr., the U.S. presidential candidate, criticizes the SEC’s regulatory approach to cryptocurrencies, calling for the appointment of crypto-friendly individuals to the commission if he is elected. Under Chair Gary Gensler, the SEC has faced criticism for its enforcement-centric strategy and lack of regulatory clarity, with Coinbase taking legal action against the SEC and a congressman proposing the removal of the chairman. Kennedy highlights the advantages of Bitcoin, emphasizing its trustworthiness, democratic decision-making process, and intrinsic value while expressing concern that the SEC prioritizes banks over the interests of the American people. In a recent interview with TheStreet, U.S. presidential candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (RFK Jr.) expressed his support for the cryptocurrency industry and criticized the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) for its regulatory approach. Kennedy, a well-known environmental attorney, and activist, emphasized the need for crypto-friendly individuals on the SEC Commission and accused the regulator of protecting banks rather than the American people. Kennedy, the nephew of former U.S. President John F. Kennedy and son of former U.S. Attorney General Robert F. Kennedy, highlighted…

    Article 2023年6月2日
  • China responds to Biden’s investment restrictions

    TL;DR Breakdown China criticizes Biden’s move to restrict U.S. tech investments. The order targets semiconductors, quantum computing, and specific AI technologies in China, Hong Kong, and Macao. Beijing accuses the U.S. of “economic coercion” and “technological bullying.” Description China has boldly come forward, openly criticizing the Biden administration’s recent endeavors to curtail U.S. investment in the technological sphere. To some, it might seem like a mere economic play, but scratch the surface, and you realize the undercurrents run deeper, touching upon themes of political posturing and global supremacy. Economic power play or political … Read more China has boldly come forward, openly criticizing the Biden administration’s recent endeavors to curtail U.S. investment in the technological sphere. To some, it might seem like a mere economic play, but scratch the surface, and you realize the undercurrents run deeper, touching upon themes of political posturing and global supremacy. Economic power play or political posturing? With the ink barely dry, Biden’s executive order targeting specific technologies in areas such as semiconductors, quantum computing, and certain realms of artificial intelligence not only in mainland…

    Article 2023年8月11日
TOP