Legal battle erupts over EU’s groundbreaking digital rules

TL;DR Breakdown

  • The Digital Services Act (DSA) is facing its first legal challenge from Zalando, Europe’s largest online fashion retailer.
  • Zalando argues that it’s unfairly labelled as a “very large platform” which incurs extra obligations to tackle online disinformation.

Description

The vanguard legislation of the European Union (EU) crafted to impose stringent regulations on major technology companies, compelling them to intensify content monitoring on their platforms, is now caught in the crosshairs of its maiden legal tussle. The dispute arose from a claim made by Europe’s premier online fashion powerhouse that it is being disproportionately … Read more

The vanguard legislation of the European Union (EU) crafted to impose stringent regulations on major technology companies, compelling them to intensify content monitoring on their platforms, is now caught in the crosshairs of its maiden legal tussle.

The dispute arose from a claim made by Europe’s premier online fashion powerhouse that it is being disproportionately affected by the new edicts.

A surprising challenger steps forward

Zalando, a German-based company, incited this legal battle on Tuesday by lodging a complaint at the EU’s General Court in Luxembourg.

The company contends that the European Commission, the executive division of the EU, has unjustly categorised it as a “very large platform.” This designation, under the Digital Services Act (DSA), comes with additional obligations to counter digital disinformation.

Interestingly, the initial wave of legal actions was anticipated to be spearheaded by Silicon Valley entities, rather than an unusual tech titan from Europe.

However, Zalando’s action could mark the starting point for further legal challenges from other big tech companies, particularly those mulling over the validity of the recently imposed EU laws.

Navigating the murky waters of the Digital Services Act

The DSA, which becomes enforceable on August 25, represents a significant transformation of the EU’s digital governance, establishing new benchmarks for controlling hate speech, false information, and counterfeit goods online.

It mandates all large digital platforms to adhere to these norms.

The European Commission recognised 19 corporations in April, assigning them specific obligations under the new law. These included prominent social platforms like TikTok and Twitter.

However, Zalando challenges the Commission’s methodology that included the German retailer in this list, labelling it as flawed. The focal point of Zalando’s argument is a perceived inconsistency in their inclusion.

The company indicates that while their website experiences more than 83 million visits each month, less than 31 million visitors are likely to purchase from third-party sellers, a number below the Commission’s 45 million threshold for DSA applicability.

Moreover, Zalando disputes the categorisation that labels them alongside firms frequently seen as bad actors in the digital space. The company asserts that such an association tarnishes their brand image.

Zalando also criticises the Commission’s misunderstanding of its hybrid business model. Over 60% of Zalando’s sales come from selling directly to consumers, with the remaining originating from third-party sellers on their site.

The DSA, in essence, is aimed at intermediaries like Zalando, to enhance regulation over the safety and authenticity of products sold online.

With its legal challenge, Zalando brings the spotlight on the validity of the EU’s classification system under the DSA.

The ongoing legal dispute opens a new chapter in the digital legal landscape, marking the first significant challenge to the EU’s ambitious overhaul of the digital governance system.

Indeed, the unfolding drama will be keenly watched by global tech giants, many of whom have grown increasingly wary of the changing digital regulatory environment within the Union.

The outcome of this case could set a significant precedent for future legal skirmishes against the bloc’s digital legislation.

Ultimately, the verdict in this landmark case will either validate the EU’s digital rulebook or compel it to rethink its approach. Either way, this battle is likely to shape the future discourse on digital regulation in Europe and beyond.

Disclaimer: The information provided is not trading advice. Cryptopolitan.com holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decision.

文章来源于互联网:Legal battle erupts over EU’s groundbreaking digital rules

Disclaimers:

1. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions and this info is not liable for any losses you may incur.

2. The copyright of this article belongs to the writer, it represents the writer's opinions only, not represents the site's ones. Not financial advice.

Previous 2023年6月29日 23:10
Next 2023年6月30日 00:07

Related articles

  • Revolut ends crypto trading services for US users amid regulatory uncertainty

    TL;DR Breakdown British banking app Revolut Ltd. will cease offering cryptocurrency trading services to US customers starting September 2, 2023, with all access to crypto holdings disabled by October 3. The change will affect less than 1% of Revolut’s global crypto customer base. Despite suspending crypto services, Revolut will continue its non-crypto business operations in the United States and has promised to support its customers through the transition. Description British digital banking app, Revolut Ltd., has disclosed its plans to cease providing cryptocurrency trading services to its customers residing in the United States. This change in operation is scheduled to take effect from September 2, 2023, with the full suspension of access to crypto holdings anticipated to be implemented a month later. According to … Read more British digital banking app, Revolut Ltd., has disclosed its plans to cease providing cryptocurrency trading services to its customers residing in the United States. This change in operation is scheduled to take effect from September 2, 2023, with the full suspension of access to crypto holdings anticipated to be implemented a month later….

    Article 2023年8月5日
  • Grayscale BTC discount narrows after the SEC court victory

    TL;DR Breakdown Grayscale’s share prices close against the Bitcoin price, now trading 17% below the BTC price, its lowest since December 2021. The SEC approval for the first Bitcoin ETF will likely increase the demand for the shares, further narrowing the current GBTC discount. Still, regulatory cards fall upon the SEC to approve, delay, or deny in making a conclusion on whether to allow the investment product. Data suggests that crypto investors are yet to embrace the full impact of having a BTC ETF in the market. Description Grayscale’s Bitcoin Investment vehicle (GBTC) share prices close against the Bitcoin price, now trading 17% below the BTC price. The discount between BTC and GBTC has dropped to its lowest since December 2021. Grayscale currently holds $17.10 billion worth of BTC. This follows a recent win by Grayscale against the Security Exchange Commission(SEC). In its … Read more Grayscale’s Bitcoin Investment vehicle (GBTC) share prices close against the Bitcoin price, now trading 17% below the BTC price. The discount between BTC and GBTC has dropped to its lowest since December 2021. Grayscale…

    Article 2023年9月12日
  • Senator Elizabeth Warren Hints at New Crypto Bill to Close Loopholes 

    TL;DR Breakdown Senator Elizabeth Warren suggests a bill to address loopholes and establish regulations in the crypto industry. She claims that crypto payments are involved in illicit activities, such as the Chinese fentanyl trade. The proposed bill aims to protect against fraud and apply common-sense rules to cryptocurrencies. In a recent development, US Senator Elizabeth Warren has hinted at the possibility of introducing a bill aimed at addressing loopholes within the crypto industry. Senator Warren has been vocal about her concerns regarding cryptocurrencies and their potential involvement in illicit activities such as the fentanyl trade with China. The proposed bill seeks to regulate the industry, close existing loopholes, and implement common-sense rules to protect against fraudulent practices.  This announcement further fuels the ongoing debate surrounding cryptocurrencies and highlights the increasingly divided political landscape surrounding their regulation in the lead-up to the US presidential election in 2024. Contents hide 1 The Alleged Involvement of Crypto Payments in the Fentanyl Trade 2 A Divided Political Class 3 Closing Loopholes and Applying Common-Sense Rules 4 Conclusion The Alleged Involvement of Crypto Payments in…

    Article 2023年6月8日
  • BRICS’ currency launch threatens financial sectors

    TL;DR Breakdown The potential launch of a new currency by BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China, South Africa) could destabilize the U.S. dollar’s dominance and threaten several U.S. financial sectors. This seismic shift could cause a domino effect across various U.S. industries including banking, finance, commodities, and international trade. The U.S. economy might suffer further if the BRICS currency becomes the standard for settling oil and gas trades. Description In the looming shadows of a global economic shift, the United States faces the specter of the BRICS nations’ prospective currency launch. This seismic change threatens to disrupt America’s position of influence, affecting several crucial financial sectors and endangering the supremacy of the U.S. dollar. The impact of this geopolitical shift promises to be both … Read more In the looming shadows of a global economic shift, the United States faces the specter of the BRICS nations’ prospective currency launch. This seismic change threatens to disrupt America’s position of influence, affecting several crucial financial sectors and endangering the supremacy of the U.S. dollar. The impact of this geopolitical shift promises to be…

    Article 2023年7月4日
  • BlockFi CEO Faces Allegations of Risk Disregard, Contributing to Collapse Amid FTX

    TL;DR Breakdown BlockFi’s CEO, Zac Prince, reportedly disregarded risk management team recommendations regarding lending assets to Alameda Research, despite concerns about the high risks associated with the exposure. Court filing suggests that BlockFi’s collapse was not solely triggered by the downfall of Alameda/FTX but rooted in earlier business practices and decisions. Description Crypto lending firm BlockFi’s CEO, Zac Prince, allegedly ignored recommendations from the company’s risk management team regarding lending assets to Alameda Research, according to a recent court filing. The filing, made on July 14 with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey by the unsecured creditors’ committee, reveals that BlockFi had … Read more Crypto lending firm BlockFi’s CEO, Zac Prince, allegedly ignored recommendations from the company’s risk management team regarding lending assets to Alameda Research, according to a recent court filing. The filing, made on July 14 with the United States Bankruptcy Court for the District of New Jersey by the unsecured creditors’ committee, reveals that BlockFi had approximately $1.2 billion tied to FTX and Alameda when the firm filed for bankruptcy in…

    Article 2023年7月15日
TOP