Coinbase asks for dismissal of SEC lawsuit, says tokens are not investment contracts

TL;DR Breakdown

  • Coinbase has filed papers asking the New York federal court to dismiss its lawsuit from the SEC, accusing the exchange of offering unregistered securities
  • Coinbase argues that tokens are not investment contracts
  • SEC has offered inadequate guidance on cryptos

Description

Coinbase, a U.S. crypto exchange, has filed papers asking the New York federal court to dismiss its lawsuit from the Securities and Exchange Commission(SEC). While the SEC accused the exchange of offering unregistered securities, Coinbase argues that the digital assets listed on its platform are not subject to the regulator’s jurisdiction in its 177-page response … Read more

Coinbase, a U.S. crypto exchange, has filed papers asking the New York federal court to dismiss its lawsuit from the Securities and Exchange Commission(SEC). While the SEC accused the exchange of offering unregistered securities, Coinbase argues that the digital assets listed on its platform are not subject to the regulator’s jurisdiction in its 177-page response to the SEC lawsuit.

Coinbase says tokens are not investment contracts

In early June, the SEC filed a lawsuit against Coinbase, saying that a dozen cryptocurrencies offered through its trading or wallet services were unregistered securities. Early on Thursday, Coinbase submitted its response, asserting that these cryptocurrencies are not securities because they are not investment contracts.

Coinbase had previously made its defense on public statements on its blog posts and tweets, but today’s filing provides more specifics supporting its claim. The exchange explains that no agreements exist if a promoter sells an asset linked to a contract regarding cryptos on the exchange’s secondary market platform, essentially citing the Supreme Court’s Howey test as an example. Hence, the filing explained the token issuers have no obligations to the investors.

According to the exchange, any investment contract that may have existed concerning the tokens offered for sale on its platform did so earlier between the parties who created the tokens and those who purchased them. Coinbase’s top lawyer Paul Grewal highlights that over ninety per cent of all coins are not eligible for sale under the internal vetting procedure used by Coinbase.

The exchange also looked into the idea that a former senior SEC official advanced that tokens that were once securities may lose that classification as the decentralized nature of the blockchains hosting them increases.

SEC has offered inadequate guidance on cryptos 

Coinbase is relying on a so-called “fair notice defense” in its argument to have the case dismissed. This defense is founded on the constitutional principle that governments can only bring legal action if they have informed the public about the particular law. Notably, its argument that its tokens on the exchange are not securities has not been tested seriously by the U.S. courts, where crypto laws are still new and in development.

The filing also heavily references SEC Chairman Gary Gensler’s public statements. Between 2021 and mid-2022, his remarks hinted that he believed the agency lacked the legal jurisdiction to regulate cryptocurrencies, and they were based on the SEC’s statement that there was a “regulatory gap” in the industry.

Coinbase highlighted its voluntary submission to regulations to the multiple overlapping regulatory bodies and has followed the SEC, senior SEC staff and the court’s guidelines regarding securities laws application to its industry for years. The exchange noted that it has been asking for SEC guidance but has yet to obtain any. According to them, the agency has instead focused on enforcement action instead of rulemaking.

Coinbase claims that the SEC’s lawsuit may have breached the “major questions” doctrine and that its due process rights had been violated in a second document submitted to the judge supervising the case. The company requested a 7-week timeline from the judge for the filing of its motion, the SEC’s opposition, and its response to that opposition.

The Coinbase request for the case to be dismissed comes as the SEC continues to crack down on crypto. The regulator recently filed a lawsuit against Binance and its U.S. affiliate for allegedly mismanaging customers’ deposits and making false statements to the regulators. Binance later filed a request to curtail the SEC’s use of language regarding the exchange’s management of customer funds, which District Court Judge Amy Berman Jackson denied. Meanwhile, they have been given until September 21 to respond to the allegations.

The information provided is not trading advice. Cryptopolitan.com holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decisions.

文章来源于互联网:Coinbase asks for dismissal of SEC lawsuit, says tokens are not investment contracts

Disclaimers:

1. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions and this info is not liable for any losses you may incur.

2. The copyright of this article belongs to the writer, it represents the writer's opinions only, not represents the site's ones. Not financial advice.

Previous 2023年7月2日 06:27
Next 2023年7月2日 08:01

Related articles

  • Best Twitter threads of the day – June 5th

    Breakdown of SEC filing against Binance/CZ 1/14 Breakdown of SEC filing against Binance/CZ Covers Binance, Binance US, CZ and all his entities. pic.twitter.com/uF7618KYf9 — Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth) (@adamscochran) June 5, 2023 2/14 Claims was aware of the rules and avoided registration. This is one that is debatable because of the rule clusterfuck that the US is. pic.twitter.com/BRV500bgQW — Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth) (@adamscochran) June 5, 2023 3/14 Calls out BNB, simple earn, and BNB Vault on the US platform as investment schemes. That will be a slam dunk for them. Tries to lump in BUSD in there – which is a snake move. Doubt that one sticks. pic.twitter.com/NR8skaPV7E — Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth) (@adamscochran) June 5, 2023 4/14 Meh. pic.twitter.com/s86rsgrVdy — Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth) (@adamscochran) June 5, 2023 5/14 Intermingling of the international and US entities – which gives US nexus exposure to their international entity and employees. Pretty bad and opens them up to more action. pic.twitter.com/vQSiKr6kMP — Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth) (@adamscochran) June 5, 2023 6/14 Specifically targeting US users does make the SEC’s case pretty easy here. pic.twitter.com/1tkENpWSfP — Adam…

    Article 2023年6月10日
  • Apple, Microsoft battle EU over iMessage and Bing

    TL;DR Breakdown Apple and Microsoft challenge the EU over the upcoming Digital Markets Act (DMA). The DMA seeks to regulate tech giants, requiring interoperability, data sharing, and more. Companies must meet criteria like €7.5bn annual turnover and 45 million monthly EU users to be governed. Description Two of the tech world’s juggernauts, Apple and Microsoft, are standing their ground against the European Union, questioning the very fabric of upcoming regulations. While both companies have been global innovators in their own right, it’s the clash with Brussels over the forthcoming Digital Markets Act (DMA) that puts the spotlight squarely on them. The … Read more Two of the tech world’s juggernauts, Apple and Microsoft, are standing their ground against the European Union, questioning the very fabric of upcoming regulations. While both companies have been global innovators in their own right, it’s the clash with Brussels over the forthcoming Digital Markets Act (DMA) that puts the spotlight squarely on them. The Controversial Lines Drawn by the Digital Markets Act Upcoming regulations proposed by the EU aim to place a leash on Big…

    Article 2023年9月6日
  • US-based Chinese ETF holders disregard growth commitment

    TL;DR Breakdown Despite China’s indications of supporting the economy during recovery, US-listed Chinese ETF holders have largely ignored this commitment, with minimal inflows to most ETFs. Investors’ reactions reflect uncertainty and mistrust, with 12 ETFs experiencing outflows, and the second-highest inflow going to an ETF betting against the Chinese market. Description Despite China’s recent indications of bolstering economic support during the nation’s strenuous recovery from the pandemic, investors in US-listed Chinese ETFs have largely disregarded the pledge, reacting with indifference. Information from VettaFi’s database illustrates this unexpected response, as only one ETF attracted significant inflows in the wake of the Chinese government’s announcement. What should have … Read more Despite China’s recent indications of bolstering economic support during the nation’s strenuous recovery from the pandemic, investors in US-listed Chinese ETFs have largely disregarded the pledge, reacting with indifference. Information from VettaFi’s database illustrates this unexpected response, as only one ETF attracted significant inflows in the wake of the Chinese government’s announcement. What should have stirred excitement in the markets appears to have done little more than prompt cautious and tactical…

    Article 2023年8月3日
  • Thailand’s new tax regulations impacting residents’ overseas income including crypto gains

    TL;DR Breakdown The Revenue Department of Thailand is set to implement significant changes to its tax regulations, targeting individuals residing in the country for more than 180 days. The regulation will affect residents engaged in foreign stock market trading through foreign brokerages, cryptocurrency traders, and Thais holding offshore accounts. Description The Revenue Department of Thailand is set to implement significant changes to its tax regulations, targeting individuals residing in the country for more than 180 days. Effective January 1, 2024, the new rule will require these residents to declare and pay personal income tax on foreign revenues, including income generated from cryptocurrency trading. Taxpayers will … Read more The Revenue Department of Thailand is set to implement significant changes to its tax regulations, targeting individuals residing in the country for more than 180 days. Effective January 1, 2024, the new rule will require these residents to declare and pay personal income tax on foreign revenues, including income generated from cryptocurrency trading. Taxpayers will submit their first tax forms reflecting overseas income in 2025, marking a shift from the previous system…

    Article 2023年9月20日
  • Crypto Unveiling: LBRY Challenges SEC’s Double Standards on Crypto Securities Law

    TL;DR Breakdown LBRY, a crypto startup, criticizes the SEC for its dual narrative regarding the classification of its LBC, as security. The SEC’s denial of Coinbase’s request for clarity on how securities laws apply to the market, along with Chairman Gary Gensler’s stance on classifying most crypto assets as securities. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) recent decision to revise the penalty on LBRY, a crypto startup, has sparked a contentious debate surrounding the agency’s approach to classifying cryptocurrencies as securities. In court filings, the SEC cited LBRY’s financial difficulties as the reason behind revising the penalty, leading LBRY to question the SEC’s dual narrative regarding its cryptocurrency, LBC.  Additionally, LBRY referred to the SEC’s Coinbase filing, which sought clarity on how securities laws apply to the market. This article delves into the SEC’s actions, LBRY’s response, and the broader implications for the industry. Contents hide 1 SEC’s Revised Penalty and LBRY’s Critique 2 SEC’s Denial of Clarity Request and Criticism of Chairman Gensler 3 LBRY’s Challenge and the SEC’s Disregard of Staff Statements 4 Conclusion SEC’s Revised Penalty…

    Article 2023年5月17日
TOP