Fed warns top U.S. banks of incoming $500b meltdown

TL;DR Breakdown

  • U.S. banks could survive a hypothetical $541bn loss, according to Federal Reserve’s annual stress tests.
  • The tests gauge banks’ ability to meet capital requirements under extreme economic scenarios.
  • Banks exceeding requirements can allocate capital to dividends and buybacks freely.

Description

The financial colossi of the United States could weather a $541 billion loss in a hypothetical economic apocalypse. This is the outcome of the annual stress tests carried out by the Federal Reserve, putting stalwarts like JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs in a favorable light, allaying Wall Street fears regarding the systemic importance of banks … Read more

The financial colossi of the United States could weather a $541 billion loss in a hypothetical economic apocalypse.

This is the outcome of the annual stress tests carried out by the Federal Reserve, putting stalwarts like JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs in a favorable light, allaying Wall Street fears regarding the systemic importance of banks amidst heavy losses.

The silver lining amidst a financial catastrophe

According to the Fed’s stress tests, U.S. banks emerged victorious with their capital reserves surpassing the test’s requirements. The tangible consequence of these test results manifests in the banks’ future capital holdings over the next year.

Should banks meet or exceed the Fed’s requirements, they could exercise freedom in allocating capital towards shareholder dividends and stock buybacks without any restrictions from the Federal Reserve.

Analysts anticipate an impending decline in the capital requirements of Wall Street stalwarts such as Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, Morgan Stanley, and Bank of America.

This prospect, coupled with the anticipation of higher dividends or expanded share buybacks, spurred a 1.5 percent increase in these banks’ stock values in after-hours trading.

This fiscal forecast comes in the wake of a tumultuous period that witnessed the collapse of three of the largest U.S. banks – Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank, and First Republic, which catalyzed a regional banking crisis.

Despite this calamity, the smaller U.S. banks feeling the heat of investor pressure, such as PacWest and Comerica, were not part of these stress tests.

Taking into account global economic indices

The resilience of the banking system was confirmed by Michael Barr, the Fed’s vice-chair for supervision. Despite acknowledging the recent crisis, Barr urged regulators to consider other measurement mechanisms, highlighting the evolving nature of financial risks.

These annual stress tests, initiated following the 2008 financial crisis as part of the Dodd-Frank financial regulations, are designed to evaluate the ability of U.S. banks to maintain loss-absorbing capital ratios above the minimum requirements during an economic downturn.

This year’s test included a hypothetical scenario of unemployment peaking at 10%, a 40% slump in commercial real estate prices, a 38% drop in house prices, and short-term interest rates nearly bottoming out.

Among the 23 tested banks, Deutsche Bank’s U.S. subsidiary took the largest capital hit, followed by UBS Americas. Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, both with substantial trading operations, saw significant declines in their capital levels.

Despite the projected losses of $541 billion, including $424 billion from loan losses and $94 billion from trading and counterparty losses, all the tested U.S. banks would meet the minimum capital requirements. In an inflation-heavy scenario, the eight largest banks would incur nearly $80 billion in trading losses.

The stress test results will be instrumental in determining the ‘stress-test capital buffer’ for each bank. This buffer is the amount of CET1 capital they must hold in excess of regulatory minimums relative to their risk-weighted assets.

This upcoming summer, the Fed, along with other U.S. banking regulators, will publish new international standards for calculating risk-weighted assets, known as the Basel III endgame rules.

However, the eventual implementation of these new rules might require American banks to hold more CET1 capital.

Despite the challenges, the U.S. banking system seems poised to withstand a significant financial blow, keeping the dreams of shareholders and financial enthusiasts afloat amidst the whirlpool of global economic uncertainties.

Disclaimer: The information provided is not trading advice. Cryptopolitan.com holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decision.

文章来源于互联网:Fed warns top U.S. banks of incoming $500b meltdown

Disclaimers:

1. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions and this info is not liable for any losses you may incur.

2. The copyright of this article belongs to the writer, it represents the writer's opinions only, not represents the site's ones. Not financial advice.

Previous 2023年7月2日 08:50
Next 2023年7月2日 10:24

Related articles

  • Debate persists: Should FTX disclose consumer names?

    TL;DR Breakdown The crypto community continues to witness the dispute over whether or not to reveal the names of customers at collapsed crypto exchange FTX. Analysts argue that disclosing the names of the customers would “impair the debtors’ ability to maximize the value that it currently possesses.” The top 50 FTX creditors are owed an estimated $3.1 billion. Kevin Cofsky, a partner at Perella Weinberg Partners, testified in the ongoing discussion around the revelation of user names at the now-defunct crypto exchange FTX, arguing that doing so would impede efforts to retrieve assets and reduce value. Despite media organizations’ calls for public disclosure, top creditors have preferred anonymity. Sam Bankman-Fried, the CEO of FTX, is accused of many financial offenses. Media outlets advocate for public disclosure of FTX creditors’ names According to reports from top media houses, the debate over whether or not to disclose the names of consumers at the defunct cryptocurrency exchange FTX is still going on. Kevin Cofsky, a partner at the investment firm Perella Weinberg Partners, testified at a hearing on June 8 that disclosing the…

    Article 2023年6月13日
  • Navigating Nigeria’s crypto tax debate – Assessing prematurity from local stakeholders perspective 

    TL;DR Breakdown Local stakeholders continue to debate Nigeria’s crypto taxation as the government wants to dominate the digital asset market and make money from it. Nigeria’s CBDC and crypto critics argue that the move is too soon and could hamper innovation and economic progress. Stakeholders in the industry want more information about the tax consequences of crypto recognition and related processes in the DeFi market. Crypto taxation is a problem in many countries, not just Nigeria. Governments worldwide are still learning their way around this emerging and changing industry. Description Nigeria’s recent move to tax crypto transactions has sparked a discussion among local stakeholders. The Nigerian government wants to control and bring in money from the digital asset market. However, critics say the move is too soon and could slow down innovation and economic growth. Nigeria’s crypto tax concerns On May 28, the day before … Read more Nigeria’s recent move to tax crypto transactions has sparked a discussion among local stakeholders. The Nigerian government wants to control and bring in money from the digital asset market. However, critics say…

    Article 2023年7月9日
  • A crucial week ahead as global Central Banks focus on inflation

    TL;DR Breakdown Both traditional and decentralized markets are set to have a rollercoaster week as Central Banks in major economic regions start to take in inflation inventories. The crypto markets are set to have a bullish week as Bitcoin nears $31,000. The United States continues to lead the charge on inflation that has crippled global markets for more than a year. Description In the realm of global finance, few events hold as much significance as central banks addressing the issue of inflation. With economies around the world grappling with rising prices, it becomes imperative to understand the impact of central bank decisions on the global financial landscape. Contents hide 1 Inflation takes over global markets 2 What … Read more In the realm of global finance, few events hold as much significance as central banks addressing the issue of inflation. With economies around the world grappling with rising prices, it becomes imperative to understand the impact of central bank decisions on the global financial landscape. Contents hide 1 Inflation takes over global markets 2 What will be happening in Europe?…

    Article 2023年6月28日
  • Reviving the Blocksize Wars: How the struggle for salability continues to resonate in the Bitcoin world

    TL;DR Breakdown The blocksize debate remains a significant topic within the Bitcoin community, highlighting the ongoing challenge of achieving scalability while maintaining decentralization. Different factions in the Bitcoin community have varying perspectives on the blocksize issue. Some advocate for increasing the blocksize to accommodate more transactions per block, while others prioritize keeping the blocksize limited to preserve decentralization and network security. The Blocksize Debate emerged as a result of the growing popularity of Bitcoin and the increasing strain it placed on the network’s capacity. At the heart of the issue was the block size limit, a parameter that restricts the number of transactions that can be included in a single block. Bitcoin’s original block size limit was set at 1 megabyte (MB), but as transaction volumes surged, concerns arose regarding scalability and the network’s ability to handle larger transaction volumes efficiently. Contents hide 1 The Factions: Big Blocks vs. Small Blocks 1.1 1. Big Blocks: 1.2 2. Small Blocks: 2 The scaling debate intensifies 2.1 1. Segregated Witness (SegWit): 2.2 2. Bitcoin Unlimited: 3 Forks and Divisions 3.1 1. Network…

    Article 2023年5月19日
  • BOK outline plans to adopt CBDC in the future

    TL;DR Breakdown The Bank of Korea (BOK) has announced that it has its sights set on the adoption of CBDC. The bank has been carrying out consultations and research to implement the payment system. Description The Bank of Korea (BOK) recently released its 2022 Payment and Settlement Systems Report, signaling successful oversight of the systems and a strategic focus on the future with Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). The report also shed light on the discussions surrounding stablecoin regulations in South Korea. BOK plans for the future with CBDC adoption … Read more The Bank of Korea (BOK) recently released its 2022 Payment and Settlement Systems Report, signaling successful oversight of the systems and a strategic focus on the future with Central Bank Digital Currency (CBDC). The report also shed light on the discussions surrounding stablecoin regulations in South Korea. BOK plans for the future with CBDC adoption One significant development highlighted in the report is the planned upgrade of the BOK-Wire+ fast payment system to a real-time gross settlement (RTGS) system. The transition to RTGS, coupled with the adoption…

    Article 2023年7月21日
TOP