Fed warns top U.S. banks of incoming $500b meltdown

TL;DR Breakdown

  • U.S. banks could survive a hypothetical $541bn loss, according to Federal Reserve’s annual stress tests.
  • The tests gauge banks’ ability to meet capital requirements under extreme economic scenarios.
  • Banks exceeding requirements can allocate capital to dividends and buybacks freely.

Description

The financial colossi of the United States could weather a $541 billion loss in a hypothetical economic apocalypse. This is the outcome of the annual stress tests carried out by the Federal Reserve, putting stalwarts like JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs in a favorable light, allaying Wall Street fears regarding the systemic importance of banks … Read more

The financial colossi of the United States could weather a $541 billion loss in a hypothetical economic apocalypse.

This is the outcome of the annual stress tests carried out by the Federal Reserve, putting stalwarts like JPMorgan Chase and Goldman Sachs in a favorable light, allaying Wall Street fears regarding the systemic importance of banks amidst heavy losses.

The silver lining amidst a financial catastrophe

According to the Fed’s stress tests, U.S. banks emerged victorious with their capital reserves surpassing the test’s requirements. The tangible consequence of these test results manifests in the banks’ future capital holdings over the next year.

Should banks meet or exceed the Fed’s requirements, they could exercise freedom in allocating capital towards shareholder dividends and stock buybacks without any restrictions from the Federal Reserve.

Analysts anticipate an impending decline in the capital requirements of Wall Street stalwarts such as Goldman Sachs, JPMorgan, Morgan Stanley, and Bank of America.

This prospect, coupled with the anticipation of higher dividends or expanded share buybacks, spurred a 1.5 percent increase in these banks’ stock values in after-hours trading.

This fiscal forecast comes in the wake of a tumultuous period that witnessed the collapse of three of the largest U.S. banks – Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank, and First Republic, which catalyzed a regional banking crisis.

Despite this calamity, the smaller U.S. banks feeling the heat of investor pressure, such as PacWest and Comerica, were not part of these stress tests.

Taking into account global economic indices

The resilience of the banking system was confirmed by Michael Barr, the Fed’s vice-chair for supervision. Despite acknowledging the recent crisis, Barr urged regulators to consider other measurement mechanisms, highlighting the evolving nature of financial risks.

These annual stress tests, initiated following the 2008 financial crisis as part of the Dodd-Frank financial regulations, are designed to evaluate the ability of U.S. banks to maintain loss-absorbing capital ratios above the minimum requirements during an economic downturn.

This year’s test included a hypothetical scenario of unemployment peaking at 10%, a 40% slump in commercial real estate prices, a 38% drop in house prices, and short-term interest rates nearly bottoming out.

Among the 23 tested banks, Deutsche Bank’s U.S. subsidiary took the largest capital hit, followed by UBS Americas. Goldman Sachs and Morgan Stanley, both with substantial trading operations, saw significant declines in their capital levels.

Despite the projected losses of $541 billion, including $424 billion from loan losses and $94 billion from trading and counterparty losses, all the tested U.S. banks would meet the minimum capital requirements. In an inflation-heavy scenario, the eight largest banks would incur nearly $80 billion in trading losses.

The stress test results will be instrumental in determining the ‘stress-test capital buffer’ for each bank. This buffer is the amount of CET1 capital they must hold in excess of regulatory minimums relative to their risk-weighted assets.

This upcoming summer, the Fed, along with other U.S. banking regulators, will publish new international standards for calculating risk-weighted assets, known as the Basel III endgame rules.

However, the eventual implementation of these new rules might require American banks to hold more CET1 capital.

Despite the challenges, the U.S. banking system seems poised to withstand a significant financial blow, keeping the dreams of shareholders and financial enthusiasts afloat amidst the whirlpool of global economic uncertainties.

Disclaimer: The information provided is not trading advice. Cryptopolitan.com holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decision.

文章来源于互联网:Fed warns top U.S. banks of incoming $500b meltdown

Disclaimers:

1. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions and this info is not liable for any losses you may incur.

2. The copyright of this article belongs to the writer, it represents the writer's opinions only, not represents the site's ones. Not financial advice.

Previous 2023年7月2日 08:50
Next 2023年7月2日 10:24

Related articles

  • Everything to know about the list of tokens that the SEC says are securities

    TL;DR Breakdown The US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has publicly listed a series of crypto assets it deems as securities, applying the Howey Test. Prominent tokens listed include XRP, Decentraland (MANA), and Beaxy Token (BXY). Binance and its CEO, Changpeng Zhao, face SEC scrutiny for alleged securities law violations. In the fluid universe of cryptocurrency, the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has recently sharpened its perspective on regulations, laying out a clear delineation of tokens it deems to be securities. The declaration came in April in the form of a list that was shared publicly by the Commission’s five members, an aggregation that comprises high-profile crypto assets that are considered to have been put forth as unregistered securities. The Howey Test: The regulatory litmus test For the classification of these digital assets, the SEC employed the widely accepted Howey Test. This established legal precedent comes with four tenets: the act of investing money, participation in a common business, harboring a reasonable expectation of profits, and the derivation of those profits from the efforts of other parties. A token…

    Article 2023年6月10日
  • Central African Republic leverages Bitcoin and IMF’s credit facility to boost economy

    TL;DR Breakdown CAR progresses in a 38-month IMF-backed fiscal reform program. IMF anticipates 2.2% GDP growth for CAR post-Bitcoin adoption. Despite delays, the government continues with the Sango Project, promoting cryptocurrency integration. The Central African Republic (CAR) has embarked on an ambitious 38-month journey under the Extended Credit Facility (ECF) with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). This initiative, part of the 2023 Article IV Consultation, demonstrates the nation’s commitment to transformative fiscal reforms to stimulate economic growth and achieve financial stability. CAR’s reform agenda, as detailed in the IMF report, spotlights key measures that have seen noteworthy progress. The central piece of these initiatives is consolidating the Treasury Single Account (TSA). With the IMF’s technical assistance, the government is working diligently to merge all government bank accounts under a single platform, thus providing a panoramic view of cash resources at the state’s disposal. The first half of 2023 anticipates an important agreement between the Bank of Central African States and the Treasury, setting the stage for the management of the TSA. The government intends to improve fiscal transparency by extending…

    Article 2023年5月26日
  • Bitcoin critic Sen. Menendez faces federal bribery allegations

    TL;DR Breakdown U.S. Senator Bob Menendez, a critic of Bitcoin in El Salvador, is implicated in a federal bribery scandal. The Senator holds the influential position of Chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee. Menendez previously warned of corruption potential in El Salvador’s Bitcoin adoption. Description U.S. Senator Bob Menendez, a prominent critic of Bitcoin’s adoption in El Salvador, finds himself amid a federal bribery scandal. The New Jersey Democrat and Chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, a powerhouse position in the Senate, now faces allegations of questionable relationships with local business moguls. The indictment, issued by a grand jury in … Read more U.S. Senator Bob Menendez, a prominent critic of Bitcoin’s adoption in El Salvador, finds himself amid a federal bribery scandal. The New Jersey Democrat and Chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, a powerhouse position in the Senate, now faces allegations of questionable relationships with local business moguls. The indictment, issued by a grand jury in Manhattan federal court, paints a detailed picture. It alleges that Sen. Menendez and his wife benefited from a “corrupt relationship” with three…

    Article 2023年9月24日
  • Liquity price analysis: LGTY struggles at $1.03 after a bearish slide

    TL;DR Breakdown Liquity price analysis favours the bears. Support is rigidly standing at $1.02. LQTY is down by 4.7 per cent. The Liquity price analysis shows a bearish trend in the market. The price underwent a considerable decline and is now struggling at $1.03. The bears have a slight advantage over the bulls in this range which has made it difficult for the price to break out of it. Support, however, is rigidly standing at $1.02 – and moving beyond that could be seen as a bullish sign. Given its current situation, LQTY is down by 4.7 per cent in the past 24 hours. The market looks quite uncertain, and any immediate price movement might be difficult to predict.  LQTY/USD 1-day price chart: LQTY price follows a downward path to $1.03 The daily Liquity price analysis chart does not look good for the bulls. The price experienced a bearish slide, and it has been trying to break above $1.03 without any success. However, there is still support at $1.02 that might give the price some momentum to climb up again…

    Article 2023年6月12日
  • Top global firms react to the state of China’s economy

    TL;DR Breakdown Global corporations exhibit caution in dealing with China’s frail economic recovery post-pandemic. Mixed corporate responses highlight the varied impacts of the country’s economic conditions across sectors. The slower growth rate and ‘tortuous’ recovery path raise concerns. Description A flimsy recovery from the global pandemic has marked China’s economy with uncertainty. This precarious situation has elicited an array of responses from global corporations, spanning sectors from finance to technology. Navigating these choppy economic waters, international firms are embracing caution, particularly in their dealings with the world’s second-largest economy. Mixed responses to China’s economic … Read more A flimsy recovery from the global pandemic has marked China’s economy with uncertainty. This precarious situation has elicited an array of responses from global corporations, spanning sectors from finance to technology. Navigating these choppy economic waters, international firms are embracing caution, particularly in their dealings with the world’s second-largest economy. Mixed responses to China’s economic state The corporate world’s apprehensions are well-justified. For instance, Citigroup has expressed its disappointment as China’s growth rate slackened, following a fleeting surge after reopening. Likewise, Dow Inc.,…

    Article 2023年7月26日
TOP