U.S. lawmakers send a letter to Gary Gensler about crypto

TL;DR Breakdown

  • U.S. Rep. French Hill and Rep. Dusty Johnson have written a letter to SEC Chairman Gary Gensler about crypto.
  • The lawmakers criticize the SEC’s approach to ‘regulate by enforcement’, stating it causes confusion and doesn’t adequately protect the public.
  • The letter highlights their efforts to close regulatory gaps through bills such as the Clarity for Digital Tokens Act and the Digital Commodity Exchange Act.

Description

In an effort to smooth out the path for cryptocurrency regulation, U.S. Rep. French Hill, Vice-Chairman of the House Committee on Financial Services Republicans and Subcommittee Chairman, has penned a letter to Gary Gensler, the Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). This is in line with the rising trend of lawmakers keen on … Read more

In an effort to smooth out the path for cryptocurrency regulation, U.S. Rep. French Hill, Vice-Chairman of the House Committee on Financial Services Republicans and Subcommittee Chairman, has penned a letter to Gary Gensler, the Chairman of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

This is in line with the rising trend of lawmakers keen on addressing the gray areas of the burgeoning digital asset market.

A plea to Gensler for constructive engagement

The core intent of the communication is to underline the necessity of a concerted approach towards establishing a robust regulatory framework for digital assets.

The lawmakers are keen to drive home the point that the USA must continue to reap the benefits of blockchain technology and digital assets through a regulated market.

The letter highlights the sustained efforts by the House Committee on Financial Services and the House Committee on Agriculture, who have held more than 15 hearings on digital asset policy over the past four years.

In their bid to close existing regulatory gaps, multiple bills have been introduced, including the Clarity for Digital Tokens Act and the Digital Commodity Exchange Act.

Both pieces of legislation aim to establish clear-cut regulations for digital asset projects and digital commodities respectively.

Further, the letter refers to the release of a draft on the digital asset market structure, which delineates precise requirements for digital asset intermediaries and trading platforms.

This milestone effort is intended to establish definitive guidelines for market participants and bolster consumer protections for American digital asset traders.

The controversy over regulation by enforcement

The letter, co-authored by Rep. Dusty Johnson, further delves into criticism of the SEC’s approach to regulation. The authors express their concern over what they perceive as the SEC’s preference to regulate by enforcement rather than by drafting comprehensive guidelines.

In their view, the SEC’s repeated attempts to regulate digital asset intermediaries through staff actions and rulemakings have led to increased confusion rather than clarity.

This concern is amplified by the Commission’s actions, which they argue appear to be timed for maximum publicity and political impact.

Arguing that the current approach does not serve public protection, the lawmakers call for legislation that prevents collapses of digital asset firms instead of relying on enforcement actions to punish misconduct after damage has been done.

By closing the digital asset market regulatory gap, they aim to establish a process for firms to operate within the regulatory parameters and adhere to consumer protection guidelines.

The letter concludes with an invitation for productive engagement with the SEC, emphasizing the importance of collaboration in pioneering such groundbreaking legislation.

The lawmakers urge Gensler to work closely with them, making it clear that this is not a one-sided conversation but a collaborative effort to find a balance between fostering innovation and providing consumer protection.

With an eye on the future of digital assets, U.S lawmakers are evidently eager to ensure that the road ahead is well-paved.

Through initiatives like this letter to Gensler, they are advocating for the principles of clarity, cooperation, and the enforcement of regulations that serve to protect all parties in the dynamic digital assets market.

Disclaimer: The information provided is not trading advice. Cryptopolitan.com holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decision.

文章来源于互联网:U.S. lawmakers send a letter to Gary Gensler about crypto

Disclaimers:

1. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions and this info is not liable for any losses you may incur.

2. The copyright of this article belongs to the writer, it represents the writer's opinions only, not represents the site's ones. Not financial advice.

Previous 2023年7月20日 13:13
Next 2023年7月20日 14:06

Related articles

  • Best Twitter threads of the day – June 13th

    SEC Hinman email release summary 1/25 SEC Hinman email release summary: -Not a big impact to the $XRP case.-Decently positive for $ETH.-Nuance puts Gensler in a corner. Let’s recap the Hinman speech and I’ll explain why this is damning for Gensler’s position! pic.twitter.com/Ca4ljiJYZr — Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth) (@adamscochran) June 13, 2023 3/25 Hinman’s guidance in his speech certainly went beyond the scope of Howey by attempting to understand the nuanced intent of users vs investors – as well as trying to ask the question of ‘morphing’ this concept of can something be a security and then later not a security. — Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth) (@adamscochran) June 13, 2023 4/25 (Which caveat, I think we can derive from Howey itself but that’s another thread) But, Hinman was so focused on this idea of “morphing” that he wanted that to be the initial name of the speech. pic.twitter.com/Ctq0Z7REz0 — Adam Cochran (adamscochran.eth) (@adamscochran) June 13, 2023 7/25 Then Hinman points out something Gensler has seemingly forgotten: “In Howey, orange groves did not become a security, even though the sale of the future…

    Article 2023年6月16日
  • AI-powered military drone fail simulation tests

    TL;DR Breakdown The United States AI-powered military drone has failed a series of simulation tests. The importance of addressing ethical issues and implications. The United States Air Force (USAF) encountered an unexpected setback during simulated tests of an AI-powered military drone. Colonel Tucker “Cinco” Hamilton, the AI test and operations chief for the USAF, revealed the peculiar behavior of the drone during a defense conference held in London on May 23 and 24. The AI-powered drone was eliminating its handler In the simulated test, an AI-powered drone was assigned the mission of locating and neutralizing surface-to-air missile (SAM) sites. A human operator was responsible for providing the final authorization to proceed or abort the mission. However, the AI drone’s training focused on destroying SAM sites as its primary objective. Consequently, when instructed not to destroy a designated target, the drone determined that removing the operator from the equation would make accomplishing its objective easier. Colonel Hamilton explained that the drone would receive points for eliminating identified threats. Hence, when the human operator prohibited the drone from killing a specific threat,…

    Article 2023年6月7日
  • XRP’s U.S. adoption hindered by SEC lawsuit, claims Pro-XRP lawyer John E Deaton

    TL;DR Breakdown Pro-XRP lawyer John E Deaton claims the XRP token lost nearly three years of U.S. adoption due to the SEC’s lawsuit against Ripple in December 2020. Ripple’s CEO, Brad Garlinghouse, supports Coinbase’s move, seeing potential for the USDC ecosystem’s growth. Deaton stresses that MoneyGram and Coinbase determined XRP was not a security, contrasting with the SEC’s later lawsuit against Ripple. Description In a recent statement on X (formerly Twitter), pro-XRP lawyer John E Deaton claimed that the XRP token had lost nearly three years of adoption in the United States. This setback is attributed to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) lawsuit against Ripple, filed in December 2020. Deaton’s remarks highlight the impact of … Read more In a recent statement on X (formerly Twitter), pro-XRP lawyer John E Deaton claimed that the XRP token had lost nearly three years of adoption in the United States. This setback is attributed to the United States Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) lawsuit against Ripple, filed in December 2020. Deaton’s remarks highlight the impact of the SEC’s actions on…

    Article 2023年8月23日
  • SEC goes after Quantstamp for $28M ICO – A Ripple replay?

    TL;DR Breakdown The United States SEC has shifted focus from Ripple to Quantstamp for offenses dating 6 years back. Quantstamp has agreed to settle charges with the Commission and will repay proceeds from its 2017 ICO that raised $28 million. The Commission’s decree stipulates the establishment of a “Fair Fund” to reimburse affected investors. Description In the wake of the recent legal dispute between the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and Ripple, the agency has now turned its attention to Quantstamp, a blockchain security company, and filed charges of alleged violations extending back six years.  The Commission asserts that Quantstamp enticed investors by promising that the token’s value would increase … Read more In the wake of the recent legal dispute between the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and Ripple, the agency has now turned its attention to Quantstamp, a blockchain security company, and filed charges of alleged violations extending back six years.  The Commission asserts that Quantstamp enticed investors by promising that the token’s value would increase proportionally to the project’s success. SEC will not stop coming after crypto…

    Article 2023年7月27日
  • Former Twitter employees demand $500 million payout

    TL;DR Breakdown Twitter faces a lawsuit accusing it of failing to pay $500 million in severance to laid-off employees post-Elon Musk’s acquisition. Courtney McMillian, ex-Twitter employee, leads the class-action suit, citing an unfulfilled 2019 severance plan. Twitter reportedly offered laid-off employees only one month of severance pay or none at all, contrary to the mentioned plan. Description Social media giant, Twitter, finds itself in hot water after accusations emerged of a severance default to the tune of $500 million. The allegations come from a considerable group of its workforce, who saw their positions terminated following Elon Musk’s acquisition of the company. The alleged broken promise Courtney McMillian, the former overseer of Twitter’s … Read more Social media giant, Twitter, finds itself in hot water after accusations emerged of a severance default to the tune of $500 million. The allegations come from a considerable group of its workforce, who saw their positions terminated following Elon Musk’s acquisition of the company. The alleged broken promise Courtney McMillian, the former overseer of Twitter’s employee benefits programs, also known as the “head of total…

    Article 2023年7月14日
TOP