BRICS has a China problem, and it is a bit concerning

TL;DR Breakdown

  • The BRICS alliance is facing an imbalance with China’s economic dominance overshadowing other members.
  • China’s assertive stance in foreign and military affairs due to its economic might poses issues for the consortium.
  • Strained relationships with India and Russia and rivalries with the U.S. are raising concerns.

Description

A keen observer of global diplomacy might have noticed an unusual absence at an upcoming international summit. This is not the first time that the BRICS assembly has seen such a situation, with Russia’s President, Vladimir Putin, choosing to bypass the meeting out of fear that the host country, South Africa, might act upon an … Read more

A keen observer of global diplomacy might have noticed an unusual absence at an upcoming international summit. This is not the first time that the BRICS assembly has seen such a situation, with Russia’s President, Vladimir Putin, choosing to bypass the meeting out of fear that the host country, South Africa, might act upon an international arrest warrant against him.

The implications of this hiccup might not run deep, but they highlight a much larger issue looming over the five-country alliance, where the role of China is increasingly becoming a source of disquiet.

An unbalanced alliance

BRICS, the political entity that sprouted from a mere marketing term coined by economists from Goldman Sachs, has steadily grown into a significant global consortium since its establishment in 2009.

It originally grouped together Brazil, Russia, India, and China, later adding South Africa to its roster. But as BRICS grew in size, so did the inequality within it, as China’s economic prowess overshadowed that of the other members.

The alliance was forged during a propitious convergence of economic shifts during the late ’90s and 2000s.

China capitalized on economic reforms to spearhead its low-cost manufacturing sector, while Russia and Brazil climbed out of economic turmoil and hitched a ride on the commodities boom.

India saw a spurt of growth after economic liberalization due to a payments crisis, while South Africa prospered following the end of apartheid.

But as the dust settled, it became evident that China was the only country that had truly bridged the gap towards developed-world status.

The country embraced technological innovations to transform into a knowledge-based economy, while the other BRICS nations remained tethered to their low-growth models and resource-dependent economies, plagued by varying degrees of political dysfunction and corruption.

China’s ascendancy in BRICS: A double-edged sword

China’s economic might now contests that of the United States. The size and affluence of China’s economy afford it an assertive stance in foreign and military affairs, leaving other BRICS members in its shadow.

Proposals for a common BRICS currency have floundered, with the Chinese renminbi being the only viable international currency amongst the five nations.

The power disparity within BRICS is further underscored by China’s ambitious Belt and Road Initiative. While BRICS’ own New Development Bank has extended a modest $32.8 billion in loans, China has doled out nearly $1 trillion bilaterally, using the initiative to build infrastructures and foster trade and political alignment.

But China’s growing dominance has had its downsides. It has led to strained relationships with other BRICS members, particularly India due to historical military tensions, and Russia due to China’s leverage in the energy sector.

Moreover, China’s position as a strategic rival to the U.S. threatens to destabilize the group’s relationship with Washington and Brussels.

China’s proposition to expand the BRICS alliance was met with reluctance from existing members like Brazil. If nations indebted or beholden to China are accepted, BRICS risks transforming from an advocate for emerging economies to a mouthpiece for China’s hegemonic ambitions.

If BRICS decides to manage its affairs independently, the stark differences in economic trajectories and strategic interests may pull the alliance apart.

Disclaimer: The information provided is not trading advice. Cryptopolitan.com holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decision.

文章来源于互联网:BRICS has a China problem, and it is a bit concerning

Disclaimers:

1. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions and this info is not liable for any losses you may incur.

2. The copyright of this article belongs to the writer, it represents the writer's opinions only, not represents the site's ones. Not financial advice.

Previous 2023年7月28日 04:07
Next 2023年7月28日 05:24

Related articles

  • PancakeSwap price analysis: CAKE faces pressure once more to keep below the $1.5 resistance

    TL;DR Breakdown . PancakeSwap price faced yet another rejection below $1.5 resistance . Price fell down to $1.39 today . Bullish sentiment set to be invalidated if price falls below $1.3 Description PancakeSwap price analysis shows a continuation of struggles for the token, as price took another turn downwards over the past 24 hours. CAKE price fell down to $1.39 today, incurring more than 1 percent in decline. PancakeSwap price has kept bearish since the turn of the current month, and has kept below the current $1.5 … Read more PancakeSwap price analysis shows a continuation of struggles for the token, as price took another turn downwards over the past 24 hours. CAKE price fell down to $1.39 today, incurring more than 1 percent in decline. PancakeSwap price has kept bearish since the turn of the current month, and has kept below the current $1.5 resistance since June 10. Buyers would be hopeful of a swift uptrend, but CAKE could remain bearish in the long-run. Trading volume over the past 24 hours picked up 17 percent, but receding price suggests…

    Article 2023年6月22日
  • Jimbos protocol offers deal to attacker following exploit

    TL;DR Breakdown Jimbos protocol has offered a deal to the attacker that stole $7.5 million from its platform. The platform is working with security agencies to fish out the attacker. In a recent incident, the team behind the decentralized finance (DeFi) application Jimbos Protocol has taken a unique approach to deal with an exploiter who drained $7.5 million from its treasury-owned liquidity pool. The team has offered the attacker a proposition: return 90% of the funds and keep the remaining 10%, or face potential prosecution and legal consequences. Jimbos asked the attacker to take the deal or face prosecution On May 28, the Jimbos team posted a message on the Ethereum network, stating that if 90% of the funds were returned, the attacker would not be prosecuted. Seeking a response, they later issued a second message on the same day, setting a deadline of “tomorrow by 4 PM UTC” for the return of the funds. The team emphasized that failure to comply would result in their collaboration with law enforcement agencies. Following the expiration of the deadline, the team announced…

    Article 2023年6月3日
  • Take These Next Steps To Distinguish Recession vs Depression

    Description The ebb and flow of an economy often set the tone for many important decisions at both micro and macro levels. Whether it is a multinational corporation strategizing its financial trajectory or a household planning its budget, the state of the economy significantly impacts these choices. Therefore, an understanding of different economic conditions, such as … Read more The ebb and flow of an economy often set the tone for many important decisions at both micro and macro levels. Whether it is a multinational corporation strategizing its financial trajectory or a household planning its budget, the state of the economy significantly impacts these choices. Therefore, an understanding of different economic conditions, such as recessions and depressions, is crucial. This guide aims to present a comprehensive yet accessible exposition on the distinction between a recession vs depression. This guide intends to equip its readers with the understanding to navigate the complex landscape of economic downturns and their far-reaching implications. Contents hide 1 Understanding Economic Terminology 2 Overview of a Recession 3 Overview of a Depression 4 Analyzing the Key Differences…

    Article 2023年7月5日
  • Ethereum’s dormant ICO investor resurfaces with whopping $3.7 million ETH transfer

    TL;DR Breakdown The unexpected return of an Ethereum ICO investor after 8 years sparks intrigue in the crypto community. Investor’s massive $3.7 million ETH transfer raises questions about their long-term strategy. Ethereum’s ICO participant chose to stake for network protection and growth potential. Description Ethereum‘s cryptocurrency community was taken aback by the unexpected return of its initial coin offering (ICO) participant after an eight-year absence. The investor, who had acquired a substantial $2,000ETH during the Genesis phase when the ICO price was just $0.31 per ETH, made headlines by transferring $641ETH, currently valued at a staggering $3.7 million in … Read more Ethereum‘s cryptocurrency community was taken aback by the unexpected return of its initial coin offering (ICO) participant after an eight-year absence. The investor, who had acquired a substantial $2,000ETH during the Genesis phase when the ICO price was just $0.31 per ETH, made headlines by transferring $641ETH, currently valued at a staggering $3.7 million in the market. An Ethereum ICO participant woke up after 8 years of dormancy, transferred 641 $ETH out, and started staking. He received 2K…

    Article 2023年8月1日
  • SEC goes after Quantstamp for $28M ICO – A Ripple replay?

    TL;DR Breakdown The United States SEC has shifted focus from Ripple to Quantstamp for offenses dating 6 years back. Quantstamp has agreed to settle charges with the Commission and will repay proceeds from its 2017 ICO that raised $28 million. The Commission’s decree stipulates the establishment of a “Fair Fund” to reimburse affected investors. Description In the wake of the recent legal dispute between the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and Ripple, the agency has now turned its attention to Quantstamp, a blockchain security company, and filed charges of alleged violations extending back six years.  The Commission asserts that Quantstamp enticed investors by promising that the token’s value would increase … Read more In the wake of the recent legal dispute between the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission and Ripple, the agency has now turned its attention to Quantstamp, a blockchain security company, and filed charges of alleged violations extending back six years.  The Commission asserts that Quantstamp enticed investors by promising that the token’s value would increase proportionally to the project’s success. SEC will not stop coming after crypto…

    Article 2023年7月27日
TOP