Why U.S. and EU need a new approach for their relationship

Description

Today’s world is caught in a whirlwind of challenges that surpass the traditional borders of military defense. It’s not just about facing down an adversary on the battlefield; the threats we face have mutated into forms that our existing systems can scarcely comprehend. The complex relationship between the U.S. and EU is at a critical … Read more

Today’s world is caught in a whirlwind of challenges that surpass the traditional borders of military defense. It’s not just about facing down an adversary on the battlefield; the threats we face have mutated into forms that our existing systems can scarcely comprehend.

The complex relationship between the U.S. and EU is at a critical juncture, and a new approach is necessary. If not, we risk failing to address the critical issues of our time, from the rise of new superpowers to climate change and technological revolution.

A Failed Current System

There is no sugarcoating the fact that our current transatlantic framework is failing us. NATO, while still playing a crucial role in areas such as support for Ukraine against Russian aggression, is proving insufficient.

The U.S. and EU find themselves burdened with matters that extend beyond NATO’s mandate. Security isn’t merely a military matter anymore. It’s about the intertwining of military security with economic security and prosperity.

These elements need a synchronized approach, not isolation in separate chambers.

The rise of China, the horrors of climate change, the intricate nature of global supply chains, transformational technologies such as artificial intelligence, and the nuclear threats from Iran and North Korea—all these matters scream for a closer U.S.-EU collaboration.

Recent joint efforts such as imposing sanctions on Russia demonstrate the potential for cooperation, but there’s more to be done.

Trade and investment between the U.S. and EU are substantial, with a third of transatlantic trade consisting of intra-company transfers and mutual investment accounting for over 30% of the total global investment. But let’s face it, this is just the tip of the iceberg.

We’re often found lacking in vision, failing to consult with one another, and diverging on vital issues. Consider the European Parliament’s sweeping AI regulation without U.S. input, or the discordant approaches to climate change, or even the U.S.’s exclusive incentives for clean technologies.

The rifts are glaring, and the need for a new strategy is undeniable.

Pathways to a Reinvented Partnership

The upcoming EU-U.S. Summit is a prime opportunity to rethink and weatherproof the transatlantic relationship against impending political storms. What’s needed is not just words, but concrete actions. Here’s a look at some daring and critical steps:

  1. Acknowledging EU’s Security Role: It’s time the EU’s increasing role in security is recognized and leveraged.
  2. Building Mechanisms for Collaboration: We must develop methods to prevent surprises in law-making without prior cross-Atlantic consultation.
  3. Economic Integration: We need to reinvent free trade and investment initiatives, aiming for a tariff-free transatlantic market within a decade, removing investment barriers, and achieving mutually recognized standards.
  4. Reviving Private Sector Organizations: Let’s create new platforms for business, labor, consumer, and environmental groups to engage transatlantic dialogue.
  5. Institutionalizing Annual EU-U.S. Summits: Regularized summits would ensure sustained efforts to strengthen the partnership.
  6. Establishing a Transatlantic Assembly: Modeled on Nato’s North Atlantic Assembly, this could foster more robust legislative collaboration.

These aren’t mere suggestions; they are imperatives. They would breathe life into a geopolitical and economic transatlantic partnership that’s fit to face the 21st century.

The U.S. and EU must reinvent their relationship for the times we live in. It’s a pressing necessity, not a choice. We cannot allow ourselves to be held back by obsolete structures and lack of collaboration.

Let’s not mince words: our failure to adapt will have consequences. The old ways won’t cut it anymore. It’s time for bold and relentless innovation, the kind that doesn’t play it safe but plays to win. It’s time for a new approach, and it can’t come a moment too soon.

  • Current U.S.-EU framework is failing to address modern challenges.
  • Security now includes economic aspects, not just military.
  • Recent divergences in AI regulation and climate policy show cracks.

文章来源于互联网:Why U.S. and EU need a new approach for their relationship

Disclaimers:

1. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions and this info is not liable for any losses you may incur.

2. The copyright of this article belongs to the writer, it represents the writer's opinions only, not represents the site's ones. Not financial advice.

Previous 2023年7月31日 00:59
Next 2023年7月31日 04:09

Related articles

  • Elon Musk goes after Twitter acquisition lawyers

    TL;DR Breakdown Elon Musk’s X Corp has filed a lawsuit against law firm Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz over a $90 million fee charged during Twitter’s acquisition. Musk claims the law firm amended its fee arrangement to gain an “improper bonus payment” and took advantage of a vulnerable corporate client. The fee was paid during a time of tumult when Musk was initially reluctant to close the Twitter deal, leading to a lawsuit from Twitter. Description Silicon Valley’s famed pioneer Elon Musk is taking on Wall Street’s elite in a groundbreaking lawsuit that encapsulates a blend of tech, finance, and legal drama. Musk’s entity, X Corp, which now owns Twitter, is squaring off against one of Wall Street’s most prestigious law firms, Wachtell, Lipton, Rosen & Katz, in a battle over … Read more Silicon Valley’s famed pioneer Elon Musk is taking on Wall Street’s elite in a groundbreaking lawsuit that encapsulates a blend of tech, finance, and legal drama. Musk’s entity, X Corp, which now owns Twitter, is squaring off against one of Wall Street’s most prestigious law firms,…

    Article 2023年7月9日
  • Australia adopts a tech-agnostic approach to define digital assets

    TL;DR Breakdown Australian Treasury has said that it will take a tech-agnostic approach toward defining digital assets. The country continues to carve a clear regulatory path. Description In a move aimed at establishing a comprehensive framework for digital assets, the Australian Treasury has announced that it will adopt a “tech agnostic” and “principles-based” approach to define and classify crypto assets. The initiative, known as token mapping, seeks to provide clarity and structure in understanding the function and purpose of various tokens within … Read more In a move aimed at establishing a comprehensive framework for digital assets, the Australian Treasury has announced that it will adopt a “tech agnostic” and “principles-based” approach to define and classify crypto assets. The initiative, known as token mapping, seeks to provide clarity and structure in understanding the function and purpose of various tokens within the cryptocurrency ecosystem. Australia wants to group assets by their unique characteristics Trevor Power, an assistant secretary at the Australian Treasury, revealed during Australian Blockchain Week that the token mapping framework would focus on categorizing tokens based on their unique…

    Article 2023年6月28日
  • U.S. and China officials meet to mend relations

    Description The recent power play between two of the world’s most influential giants, the U.S. and China, took an unexpected turn as they sought to bridge the gap in Malta. Let’s be frank here. With tensions bubbling beneath the surface, especially concerning Taiwan and the ongoing Russian conflict in Ukraine, this diplomatic encounter is like pouring … Read more The recent power play between two of the world’s most influential giants, the U.S. and China, took an unexpected turn as they sought to bridge the gap in Malta. Let’s be frank here. With tensions bubbling beneath the surface, especially concerning Taiwan and the ongoing Russian conflict in Ukraine, this diplomatic encounter is like pouring cold water on a simmering pot. But is it enough to prevent the pot from boiling over? Navigating Troubled Waters Jake Sullivan, the U.S. national security adviser, and Wang Yi, China’s top foreign policy figurehead, clocked in some serious discussion hours over the weekend. The White House emphasized the meeting’s focus on the bilateral ties and the tumultuous situation in Ukraine. There’s no missing the elephant…

    Article 2023年9月18日
  • Russia is working on something that will replace SWIFT

    TL;DR Breakdown Russia is developing an alternative to SWIFT as part of its efforts to de-dollarize its economy. Collaboration with other countries is crucial for creating an independent, interlinked payment system. This move represents a shift towards a multi-currency world, away from Western-centric financial systems. The geopolitical landscape is evolving as Russia endeavors to develop an alternative to the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication (SWIFT) system, in an attempt to foster a resilient and independent financial architecture. This initiative is part of the country’s broader efforts to de-dollarize its economy, representing a significant shift in global economic mechanisms. Russia diversifying the financial infrastructure Dmitry Birichevsky, the director of the Department of Economic Cooperation of the Russian Foreign Ministry, revealed the country’s plan at the sidelines of the International Economic Forum “Russia – Islamic World: Kazan Forum”. He indicated that the country is not standing alone in this endeavor but is collaborating with other nations to bridge national payment systems, independent of SWIFT. Highlighting the importance of this task, Birichevsky stated, “In the context of the onset of economic de-dollarization,…

    Article 2023年5月24日
  • U.S. hope in China hits all-time low – But why?

    TL;DR Breakdown U.S. business optimism in China hits a historic low, with only 52% of firms hopeful about their five-year outlook. This pessimism is not just pandemic-related; there were already underlying issues. Major concerns include geopolitical tensions between the U.S. and China, and China’s economic slowdown. Description The once-bubbling optimism that U.S. businesses held for China’s market potential is now fizzling out, hitting a historic low. And the reasons for this pessimism are far from simplistic. They are an intricate weave of geopolitical tensions, economic slowdowns, and the shadow of a pandemic that has changed the business landscape globally. Geo-Economic Frustrations From … Read more The once-bubbling optimism that U.S. businesses held for China’s market potential is now fizzling out, hitting a historic low. And the reasons for this pessimism are far from simplistic. They are an intricate weave of geopolitical tensions, economic slowdowns, and the shadow of a pandemic that has changed the business landscape globally. Geo-Economic Frustrations From the get-go, the U.S. has been an integral player in China’s massive economic theatre. Yet, as the curtain rises on…

    Article 2023年9月19日
TOP