Why U.S. and EU need a new approach for their relationship

Description

Today’s world is caught in a whirlwind of challenges that surpass the traditional borders of military defense. It’s not just about facing down an adversary on the battlefield; the threats we face have mutated into forms that our existing systems can scarcely comprehend. The complex relationship between the U.S. and EU is at a critical … Read more

Today’s world is caught in a whirlwind of challenges that surpass the traditional borders of military defense. It’s not just about facing down an adversary on the battlefield; the threats we face have mutated into forms that our existing systems can scarcely comprehend.

The complex relationship between the U.S. and EU is at a critical juncture, and a new approach is necessary. If not, we risk failing to address the critical issues of our time, from the rise of new superpowers to climate change and technological revolution.

A Failed Current System

There is no sugarcoating the fact that our current transatlantic framework is failing us. NATO, while still playing a crucial role in areas such as support for Ukraine against Russian aggression, is proving insufficient.

The U.S. and EU find themselves burdened with matters that extend beyond NATO’s mandate. Security isn’t merely a military matter anymore. It’s about the intertwining of military security with economic security and prosperity.

These elements need a synchronized approach, not isolation in separate chambers.

The rise of China, the horrors of climate change, the intricate nature of global supply chains, transformational technologies such as artificial intelligence, and the nuclear threats from Iran and North Korea—all these matters scream for a closer U.S.-EU collaboration.

Recent joint efforts such as imposing sanctions on Russia demonstrate the potential for cooperation, but there’s more to be done.

Trade and investment between the U.S. and EU are substantial, with a third of transatlantic trade consisting of intra-company transfers and mutual investment accounting for over 30% of the total global investment. But let’s face it, this is just the tip of the iceberg.

We’re often found lacking in vision, failing to consult with one another, and diverging on vital issues. Consider the European Parliament’s sweeping AI regulation without U.S. input, or the discordant approaches to climate change, or even the U.S.’s exclusive incentives for clean technologies.

The rifts are glaring, and the need for a new strategy is undeniable.

Pathways to a Reinvented Partnership

The upcoming EU-U.S. Summit is a prime opportunity to rethink and weatherproof the transatlantic relationship against impending political storms. What’s needed is not just words, but concrete actions. Here’s a look at some daring and critical steps:

  1. Acknowledging EU’s Security Role: It’s time the EU’s increasing role in security is recognized and leveraged.
  2. Building Mechanisms for Collaboration: We must develop methods to prevent surprises in law-making without prior cross-Atlantic consultation.
  3. Economic Integration: We need to reinvent free trade and investment initiatives, aiming for a tariff-free transatlantic market within a decade, removing investment barriers, and achieving mutually recognized standards.
  4. Reviving Private Sector Organizations: Let’s create new platforms for business, labor, consumer, and environmental groups to engage transatlantic dialogue.
  5. Institutionalizing Annual EU-U.S. Summits: Regularized summits would ensure sustained efforts to strengthen the partnership.
  6. Establishing a Transatlantic Assembly: Modeled on Nato’s North Atlantic Assembly, this could foster more robust legislative collaboration.

These aren’t mere suggestions; they are imperatives. They would breathe life into a geopolitical and economic transatlantic partnership that’s fit to face the 21st century.

The U.S. and EU must reinvent their relationship for the times we live in. It’s a pressing necessity, not a choice. We cannot allow ourselves to be held back by obsolete structures and lack of collaboration.

Let’s not mince words: our failure to adapt will have consequences. The old ways won’t cut it anymore. It’s time for bold and relentless innovation, the kind that doesn’t play it safe but plays to win. It’s time for a new approach, and it can’t come a moment too soon.

  • Current U.S.-EU framework is failing to address modern challenges.
  • Security now includes economic aspects, not just military.
  • Recent divergences in AI regulation and climate policy show cracks.

文章来源于互联网:Why U.S. and EU need a new approach for their relationship

Disclaimers:

1. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions and this info is not liable for any losses you may incur.

2. The copyright of this article belongs to the writer, it represents the writer's opinions only, not represents the site's ones. Not financial advice.

Previous 2023年7月31日 00:59
Next 2023年7月31日 04:09

Related articles

  • Celsius founder gets ready for New York fraud suit

    TL;DR Breakdown Alex Mashinsky, founder of the bankrupt cryptocurrency lender Celsius, must face a New York fraud lawsuit. Justice Margaret Chan ruled Mashinsky defrauded investors by misrepresenting Celsius as safe. Celsius, which had offered up to 17% interest on deposits, had a $1.19 billion deficit before filing for Chapter 11 in July 2022. Description Celsius founder Alex Mashinsky, the once influential chief of the now-defunct cryptocurrency lender, finds himself in the unenviable position of preparing to face a New York fraud lawsuit. The legal storm that has been gathering for months now seems ready to break, with a state court judge ruling that the founder must answer for allegations … Read more Celsius founder Alex Mashinsky, the once influential chief of the now-defunct cryptocurrency lender, finds himself in the unenviable position of preparing to face a New York fraud lawsuit. The legal storm that has been gathering for months now seems ready to break, with a state court judge ruling that the founder must answer for allegations of civil fraud. The case stands as a glaring warning to the broader…

    Article 2023年8月6日
  • Take These Next Steps To Distinguish Recession vs Depression

    Description The ebb and flow of an economy often set the tone for many important decisions at both micro and macro levels. Whether it is a multinational corporation strategizing its financial trajectory or a household planning its budget, the state of the economy significantly impacts these choices. Therefore, an understanding of different economic conditions, such as … Read more The ebb and flow of an economy often set the tone for many important decisions at both micro and macro levels. Whether it is a multinational corporation strategizing its financial trajectory or a household planning its budget, the state of the economy significantly impacts these choices. Therefore, an understanding of different economic conditions, such as recessions and depressions, is crucial. This guide aims to present a comprehensive yet accessible exposition on the distinction between a recession vs depression. This guide intends to equip its readers with the understanding to navigate the complex landscape of economic downturns and their far-reaching implications. Contents hide 1 Understanding Economic Terminology 2 Overview of a Recession 3 Overview of a Depression 4 Analyzing the Key Differences…

    Article 2023年7月5日
  • Robinhood prevails in investors’ meme stock appeal

    TL;DR Breakdown Robinhood wins against investors in the 11th U.S. Circuit Court regarding meme stock trading restrictions from January 2021. Investors argued restrictions caused them financial losses and stock price downturns. Court found the company’s user agreement allowed for such trade limitations. Description The contemporary stock trading landscape, studded with numerous online platforms, saw Robinhood standing tall, pushing back against dissatisfied investors. In an intense battle that weaved its way to the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta, Robinhood emerged victorious against the appeal that held it responsible for stymieing the trading of 13 coveted “meme … Read more The contemporary stock trading landscape, studded with numerous online platforms, saw Robinhood standing tall, pushing back against dissatisfied investors. In an intense battle that weaved its way to the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in Atlanta, Robinhood emerged victorious against the appeal that held it responsible for stymieing the trading of 13 coveted “meme stocks” during January 2021. Robinhood’s trading restrictions and public backlash The heat of the meme stock craze, influenced heavily by social media, saw stocks…

    Article 2023年8月11日
  • Prosecutors appeal bail decision for Terra founder amid allegations of market manipulation

    TL;DR Breakdown Kwon is accused of operating a fraudulent cryptocurrency firm in South Korea. Kwon and Han were apprehended at Podgorica airport in Montenegro, accused of trying to leave the country using counterfeit passports. The Montenegrin court charged them with forging travel documents. The prosecutors in Montenegro have appealed against a local court’s decision that granted bail to Kwon Do-hyeong, the founder of Terraform Labs, and his associate Han Chang-joon. During the hearing, accusations were made against Do Kwon, the founder of Terraform Labs, stating that he operated and organized a fraudulent cryptocurrency firm in South Korea and the United States (U.S.). As a result of these actions, the firm’s TerraUSD and Luna coins experienced a collapse. On March 23, authorities apprehended Kwon and Han, Terra’s former chief financial officer, at Podgorica airport in Montenegro. They were accused of trying to leave the country using counterfeit passports and were subject to an Interpol Red Notice, which urged law enforcement agencies to arrest them. On April 21, the Montenegrin court formally charged both South Korean individuals with the offense of forging…

    Article 2023年5月19日
  • PolkaWorld halts operations amidst treasury funding rejection controversy

    TL;DR Breakdown The PolkaWorld community has made the decision to suspend its operations following the rejection of its funding proposal from Polkadot’s treasury.  PolkaWorld claimed that the new governance platform has negatively affected those who have been long-term contributors to the Polkadot ecosystem. The organization drew a comparison with the previous governance system, which featured a council elected by Polkadot token holders. Description The PolkaWorld community has made the decision to suspend its operations following the rejection of its funding proposal from Polkadot‘s treasury. This move comes after the organization raised concerns about the management of the treasury and criticized the impact of Polkadot’s new open governance platform, OpenGov, on long-term contributors within the Polkadot ecosystem. Funding rejection … Read more The PolkaWorld community has made the decision to suspend its operations following the rejection of its funding proposal from Polkadot‘s treasury. This move comes after the organization raised concerns about the management of the treasury and criticized the impact of Polkadot’s new open governance platform, OpenGov, on long-term contributors within the Polkadot ecosystem. Funding rejection sparks concerns In an…

    Article 2023年9月16日
TOP