Is Worldcoin’s identity verification safe? data protection authorities on high alert

TL;DR Breakdown

  • The Bavarian State Office for Data Protection Supervision (BayLDA) has initiated an investigation into the human identity verification project known as Worldcoin, citing concerns over the handling of biometric data.
  • The project’s data collection methods also came under criticism from the French National Commission on Informatics and Liberty, who questioned their legality and ethics. 

Description

The Bavarian State Office for Data Protection Supervision (BayLDA) has initiated an investigation into the human identity verification project known as Worldcoin, citing concerns over the handling of biometric data. According to a report from Reuters on July 31, this investigation was launched in November 2022. Worldcoin’s primary objective was to differentiate real individuals from … Read more

The Bavarian State Office for Data Protection Supervision (BayLDA) has initiated an investigation into the human identity verification project known as Worldcoin, citing concerns over the handling of biometric data. According to a report from Reuters on July 31, this investigation was launched in November 2022. Worldcoin’s primary objective was to differentiate real individuals from bots by utilizing retinal scans for identity verification, and the project garnered significant attention, with over 2 million sign-ups prior to the launch of its token in July.

The collection and use of retinal scan data by Worldcoin drew the scrutiny of BayLDA, with the President, Michael Will, expressing reservations about the technologies’ readiness and analysis for secure financial data transfers. As a result, there were potential risks for Worldcoin users.

The project’s data collection methods also came under criticism from the French National Commission on Informatics and Liberty, who questioned their legality and ethics. Similarly, the Information Commissioner’s Office in the United Kingdom raised similar concerns over Worldcoin’s approach to data privacy and biometric information.

Worldcoin ambitious goal

Tools For Humanity, the company behind the Worldcoin project, has a subsidiary based in Germany, but the initiative has been attracting interest from users worldwide. Since its token launch in July, the co-founder of Worldcoin, Sam Altman, reported that a new person was being “verified every 8 seconds” through iris scans, highlighting the widespread usage of the project’s biometric verification system.

Several prominent figures in the cryptocurrency space have weighed in on the project, with Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin and Block CEO Jack Dorsey providing their perspectives. Many crypto enthusiasts have lauded the potential benefits of Worldcoin, particularly in scenarios where it could help compensate those affected by the collapses of entities like Three Arrows Capital and FTX.

The project’s ambitious goal to use retinal scans for identity verification has sparked debate and garnered attention from data protection authorities and prominent figures in the cryptocurrency community. While some see potential benefits in its innovative approach, others express concerns about the security and ethical implications of handling sensitive biometric data.

Disclaimer. The information provided is not trading advice. Cryptopolitan.com holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decisions.

文章来源于互联网:Is Worldcoin’s identity verification safe? data protection authorities on high alert

Disclaimers:

1. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions and this info is not liable for any losses you may incur.

2. The copyright of this article belongs to the writer, it represents the writer's opinions only, not represents the site's ones. Not financial advice.

Previous 2023年8月1日 10:22
Next 2023年8月1日 11:03

Related articles

  • Binance.US challenges SEC’s proposed restraining order, citing potential closure

    TL;DR Breakdown Binance.US has requested the U.S. District Court to reject the SEC’s proposed restraining order, warning that it would lead to the closure of its business. The crypto exchange argues that the SEC’s claims fail to identify any securities traded on its platform and questions the regulator’s assumption that all cryptocurrencies are securities. Binance.US has proposed an alternative solution to address the SEC’s concerns and suggests transferring assets to BAM’s control, ensuring customer funds remain secure while addressing registration irregularities. Binance.US has filed a request with the U.S. District Court to deny the proposed temporary restraining order by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). Binance.US argues that implementing the order would effectively lead to the closure of BAM Trading Services Inc., the entity behind Binance. US. The SEC’s emergency motion for the restraining order is scheduled for a hearing on June 13. Binance.US strongly criticized the SEC’s approach to the legal action, calling it “draconian and unduly burdensome.” The crypto exchange pointed out that the SEC still needs to identify a single security trading on BAM’s platform, countering the…

    Article 2023年6月16日
  • Historic Senate hearing sees OpenAI CEO Sam Altman championing AI safety

    TL;DR Breakdown Sam Altman, along with NYU professor Gary Marcus and IBM’s chief of trust, Christina Montgomery, illustrate how the U.S. government should regulate the AI industry. Sam Altman advocated for the establishment of a federal oversight agency with the authority to issue and revoke development licenses on AI. The proceedings focused on understanding the potential threats posed by generative AI models such as ChatGPT. In a historic event that marked a significant milestone for the field of artificial intelligence (AI), OpenAI CEO Sam Altman recently testified before the Senate in a hearing focused on AI safety. This groundbreaking hearing shed light on the challenges and opportunities presented by AI, as well as the measures necessary to ensure its safe and responsible development and deployment. Contents hide 1 Sam Altman shows the importance of AI safety 2 The Senate hearing addresses AI’s ethical concerns 3 The Senate take on Sam Altman’s testimony 4 The future of AI safety Sam Altman shows the importance of AI safety As AI continues to advance rapidly, it becomes increasingly important to address the potential…

    Article 2023年5月17日
  • Bittrex U.S. granted permission to enable customer withdrawals following bankruptcy ruling

    TL;DR Breakdown Bittrex US, the American branch of the cryptocurrency exchange, has received court approval to allow customer withdrawals following its recent bankruptcy filing. The court ruling authorizes customers with undisputed, noncontingent, and liquidated claims to withdraw their cryptocurrency assets and fiat currency from the platform. Ownership disputes and the potential for clawbacks remain unresolved, as the ruling does not clarify the legal ownership of frozen assets or determine the priority of customer claims over those of the U.S. government. Bittrex US, the American branch of the cryptocurrency exchange Bittrex, has been granted permission by a Delaware bankruptcy court to initiate customer withdrawals following its recent bankruptcy filing. The court ruling comes amidst opposition from the U.S. government, which claims that the exchange owes millions of dollars for sanctions violations. Delaware court authorizes Bittrex US to facilitate withdrawals for customers In a recent ruling, Judge Brendan Shannon of the Delaware bankruptcy court authorized Bittrex US and its affiliates to enable customer withdrawals. The ruling allows customers with undisputed, noncontingent, and liquidated claims to withdraw their cryptocurrency assets and fiat currency…

    Article 2023年6月17日
  • Beware of crypto scams amid the XRP hype

    TL;DR Breakdown Ripple Labs recently won a court case, leading to a surge in the XRP token’s value. This victory marks significant progress towards regulatory clarity in the U.S. crypto industry. The sudden increase in XRP’s value has attracted scammers looking to exploit the hype. Description The recent legal victory of Ripple Labs, with the courts declaring its XRP token as not a security, has stirred up a surge of excitement among investors and cryptocurrency enthusiasts. However, with heightened interest comes a surge in potential scams, a matter that Ripple’s Chief Technology Officer, David Schwartz, has passionately highlighted to protect the … Read more The recent legal victory of Ripple Labs, with the courts declaring its XRP token as not a security, has stirred up a surge of excitement among investors and cryptocurrency enthusiasts. However, with heightened interest comes a surge in potential scams, a matter that Ripple’s Chief Technology Officer, David Schwartz, has passionately highlighted to protect the public. The journey to regulatory clarity This recent boom in XRP interest results from a court ruling in favor of Ripple…

    Article 2023年7月15日
  • Crypto Unveiling: LBRY Challenges SEC’s Double Standards on Crypto Securities Law

    TL;DR Breakdown LBRY, a crypto startup, criticizes the SEC for its dual narrative regarding the classification of its LBC, as security. The SEC’s denial of Coinbase’s request for clarity on how securities laws apply to the market, along with Chairman Gary Gensler’s stance on classifying most crypto assets as securities. The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission’s (SEC) recent decision to revise the penalty on LBRY, a crypto startup, has sparked a contentious debate surrounding the agency’s approach to classifying cryptocurrencies as securities. In court filings, the SEC cited LBRY’s financial difficulties as the reason behind revising the penalty, leading LBRY to question the SEC’s dual narrative regarding its cryptocurrency, LBC.  Additionally, LBRY referred to the SEC’s Coinbase filing, which sought clarity on how securities laws apply to the market. This article delves into the SEC’s actions, LBRY’s response, and the broader implications for the industry. Contents hide 1 SEC’s Revised Penalty and LBRY’s Critique 2 SEC’s Denial of Clarity Request and Criticism of Chairman Gensler 3 LBRY’s Challenge and the SEC’s Disregard of Staff Statements 4 Conclusion SEC’s Revised Penalty…

    Article 2023年5月17日
TOP