U.S. realizes national and economic security’s bond

TL;DR Breakdown

  • U.S. recognizes the interconnectedness of national and economic security.
  • White House issues order to limit tech investments in China.
  • Focus is on expertise transfer, not just capital.

Description

For years, the U.S. operated under a seemingly clear distinction: national security was one pillar, and economic stability was another. Yet, the blurring lines between economic and national interests now challenge this compartmentalized view. The United States is waking up to a reality that other major players, particularly China, have recognized for a long time: … Read more

For years, the U.S. operated under a seemingly clear distinction: national security was one pillar, and economic stability was another. Yet, the blurring lines between economic and national interests now challenge this compartmentalized view.

The United States is waking up to a reality that other major players, particularly China, have recognized for a long time: national security and economic security are two sides of the same coin.

The Tech Split and Its Underlying Motives

When it comes to technological prowess, China’s relentless march forward has not gone unnoticed in the West.

With the recent executive order from the White House, the U.S. has taken a decisive step to decouple from China in high-risk technological sectors like semiconductors, quantum computing, and artificial intelligence.

The reason? Simple. It’s one thing to engage in healthy competition; it’s another to inadvertently bolster the military and strategic prowess of a potential adversary.

But here’s the catch: this move isn’t just about money. If you think it’s about the billions of dollars in investments, you’re missing the bigger picture. This is about expertise and intellectual capital – the patents, data, software, and other IP.

It’s one thing to pour money into a venture, but it’s another to inadvertently transfer the very innovations that could tilt the balance of power in an increasingly bipolar world.

Let’s not kid ourselves. The drop in U.S. dollar funding for China-focused venture capital from a whopping $95bn in 2021 to a mere $14bn in 2022 wasn’t just a market hiccup. It was a deliberate recalibration. The newest executive mandate will tighten the noose even further.

The Broader Challenge: Redefining Boundaries

Now, the crux of the matter lies in determining the limits. It’s like setting up a fence in your yard – how small should the yard be and how high should the fence go? Consider technologies like artificial intelligence.

Today, AI can either revolutionize the music industry or wreak havoc on our financial systems. Where do we draw the line? As the White House wrangles with these questions, they’ve turned to stakeholders from all walks of life.

The feedback, though diverse, shows a significant alignment, especially among tech giants. However, some believe the measures might not go far enough.

But here’s another sobering thought: What if we successfully guard our technological gems and yet remain vulnerable elsewhere? Think pharmaceuticals, biotech, shipbuilding, and more.

It’s no longer about just keeping adversaries out of our tech labs. It’s about understanding the entire supply chain, knowing where potential chokepoints are, and ensuring that neither states nor corporations can hold the U.S. to ransom.

For too long, the U.S. has viewed trade merely as a tool of policy, shying away from seeing it as an integral part of national security. The Biden administration seems to signal a departure from this ‘market-knows-best’ philosophy.

They recognize the need for government intervention to strengthen our industrial base, workforce, and defense. However, the roadmap remains elusive.

There will be naysayers, of course. Critics who claim such measures only exacerbate tensions. But here’s the bitter pill we all must swallow: these realities have always been in our periphery, stark and evident.

The West operated under the illusion that economic interests could be neatly separated from security concerns. China, in contrast, viewed them as intertwined.

Disclaimer: The information provided is not trading advice. Cryptopolitan.com holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decision.

文章来源于互联网:U.S. realizes national and economic security’s bond

Disclaimers:

1. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions and this info is not liable for any losses you may incur.

2. The copyright of this article belongs to the writer, it represents the writer's opinions only, not represents the site's ones. Not financial advice.

Previous 2023年8月14日 21:03
Next 2023年8月14日 22:47

Related articles

  • African banks in panic mode as fintech and telcos gain ground

    TL;DR Breakdown Around 40% of the 153 African banks surveyed by African Banker’s annual report view fintechs and telcos as substantial threats. 69% of the surveyed banks consider artificial intelligence (AI) as the key technology shaping the banking industry’s future. Despite the recognized importance of digital technology, only 28% of the banks are spending more than $3 million annually on digital transformation and innovation. The banking landscape in Africa is at a crossroads, with nearly half of the continent’s financial institutions identifying fintechs and telecommunications companies as significant threats, according to the most recent African Banker annual report. With the rapid digital transformation across industries, the banking sector in the continent is being compelled to adapt or risk being sidelined. Disruption in the African banking landscape The survey included 153 African banks, with approximately 40% signaling high concern over the rise of fintechs and telcos in the financial ecosystem. Meanwhile, a significant 69% saw artificial intelligence (AI) as the most critical technology shaping the banking industry’s future. However, despite recognizing the looming revolution, only a little over a quarter of…

    Article 2023年5月21日
  • Coinbase’s New Blockchain: A Breeding Ground for Scam Tokens?

    TL;DR Breakdown While the crypto community champions complete decentralization, the rise of scam tokens and illicit activities highlights the need for some regulatory oversight. Platforms like Coinbase advocate for a balance between innovation and consumer protection, suggesting a future where collaboration between the crypto industry and regulators is essential. Description Decentralisation, a core tenet of the blockchain world, is not a one-size-fits-all concept. While developers often boast about their projects being governed purely by code, the reality is that not all blockchains and protocols are created equal. This distinction becomes crucial when considering the recent surge of scam tokens on Coinbase‘s new blockchain. Coinbase, a … Read more Decentralisation, a core tenet of the blockchain world, is not a one-size-fits-all concept. While developers often boast about their projects being governed purely by code, the reality is that not all blockchains and protocols are created equal. This distinction becomes crucial when considering the recent surge of scam tokens on Coinbase‘s new blockchain. Coinbase, a leading name in the crypto industry, recently launched a layer-2 blockchain built atop Ethereum named Base. Even…

    Article 2023年8月17日
  • Democratic congressman Ritchie Torres takes on SEC over crypto industry

    TL;DR Breakdown Representative Ritchie Torres criticizes SEC’s crypto regulation as a “war on the whole industry.” Torres proposes FIT Act to reform the crypto market structure and define SEC’s jurisdiction. Crypto assets may shift to CFTC oversight upon demonstrating decentralization. Description Representative Ritchie Torres (D-CA) has taken a stand against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in what he calls a “war on the whole industry” in the cryptocurrency space. On July 28, Torres publicly criticized the regulatory agency’s approach under Chair Gary Gensler, accusing the SEC of “regulation by enforcement” and imposing arbitrary actions … Read more Representative Ritchie Torres (D-CA) has taken a stand against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in what he calls a “war on the whole industry” in the cryptocurrency space. On July 28, Torres publicly criticized the regulatory agency’s approach under Chair Gary Gensler, accusing the SEC of “regulation by enforcement” and imposing arbitrary actions on crypto innovators. In response to these concerns, Torres has put forth the Financial Innovation and Technology (FIT) for the 21st Century Act. This proposed legislation…

    Article 2023年7月29日
  • Algeria officially asks to be a part of the BRICS

    TL;DR Breakdown Algeria has officially applied to join the BRICS, a coalition of Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. The move aims to diversify Algeria’s oil and gas-based economy and open new economic opportunities. Algeria plans to contribute $1.5 billion as a shareholder member of the BRICS Bank. Description Algeria has formally petitioned to be incorporated into the influential BRICS coalition, comprising Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. The move, confirmed by Algerian President Abdelmadjid Tebboune, is a strategic effort to foster new economic opportunities and diversify Algeria’s economy, traditionally reliant on its rich oil and gas resources. Seeking greater economic opportunities President … Read more Algeria has formally petitioned to be incorporated into the influential BRICS coalition, comprising Brazil, Russia, India, China, and South Africa. The move, confirmed by Algerian President Abdelmadjid Tebboune, is a strategic effort to foster new economic opportunities and diversify Algeria’s economy, traditionally reliant on its rich oil and gas resources. Seeking greater economic opportunities President Tebboune’s confirmation of the application, during his return from a diplomatic visit to China, marks a significant…

    Article 2023年7月22日
  • Fitch’s downgrade of U.S. debt finds solid ground

    TL;DR Breakdown Fitch downgrades U.S. credit rating from AAA to AA+. Blackstone’s Stephen Schwarzman supports the downgrade, highlighting fiscal concerns. Unlike the 2011 S&P downgrade, economists are less alarmed this time. Reasons include projected fiscal decline, mounting debt, and congressional conflicts. Description Few can argue with Fitch’s decision to slash the U.S. rating from AAA to AA+. When a revered institution sounds the alarm over America’s swelling debt and wavering fiscal discipline, it’s time to sit up and listen. A decade has passed since Standard & Poor raised eyebrows by cutting its rating on U.S. debt. Yet, … Read more Few can argue with Fitch’s decision to slash the U.S. rating from AAA to AA+. When a revered institution sounds the alarm over America’s swelling debt and wavering fiscal discipline, it’s time to sit up and listen. A decade has passed since Standard & Poor raised eyebrows by cutting its rating on U.S. debt. Yet, this week, Fitch took a similar step, setting Wall Street abuzz. Echoes of 2011 Blackstone’s top dog, Stephen Schwarzman, isn’t among the naysayers. On CNBC’s…

    Article 2023年8月7日
TOP