U.S. realizes national and economic security’s bond

TL;DR Breakdown

  • U.S. recognizes the interconnectedness of national and economic security.
  • White House issues order to limit tech investments in China.
  • Focus is on expertise transfer, not just capital.

Description

For years, the U.S. operated under a seemingly clear distinction: national security was one pillar, and economic stability was another. Yet, the blurring lines between economic and national interests now challenge this compartmentalized view. The United States is waking up to a reality that other major players, particularly China, have recognized for a long time: … Read more

For years, the U.S. operated under a seemingly clear distinction: national security was one pillar, and economic stability was another. Yet, the blurring lines between economic and national interests now challenge this compartmentalized view.

The United States is waking up to a reality that other major players, particularly China, have recognized for a long time: national security and economic security are two sides of the same coin.

The Tech Split and Its Underlying Motives

When it comes to technological prowess, China’s relentless march forward has not gone unnoticed in the West.

With the recent executive order from the White House, the U.S. has taken a decisive step to decouple from China in high-risk technological sectors like semiconductors, quantum computing, and artificial intelligence.

The reason? Simple. It’s one thing to engage in healthy competition; it’s another to inadvertently bolster the military and strategic prowess of a potential adversary.

But here’s the catch: this move isn’t just about money. If you think it’s about the billions of dollars in investments, you’re missing the bigger picture. This is about expertise and intellectual capital – the patents, data, software, and other IP.

It’s one thing to pour money into a venture, but it’s another to inadvertently transfer the very innovations that could tilt the balance of power in an increasingly bipolar world.

Let’s not kid ourselves. The drop in U.S. dollar funding for China-focused venture capital from a whopping $95bn in 2021 to a mere $14bn in 2022 wasn’t just a market hiccup. It was a deliberate recalibration. The newest executive mandate will tighten the noose even further.

The Broader Challenge: Redefining Boundaries

Now, the crux of the matter lies in determining the limits. It’s like setting up a fence in your yard – how small should the yard be and how high should the fence go? Consider technologies like artificial intelligence.

Today, AI can either revolutionize the music industry or wreak havoc on our financial systems. Where do we draw the line? As the White House wrangles with these questions, they’ve turned to stakeholders from all walks of life.

The feedback, though diverse, shows a significant alignment, especially among tech giants. However, some believe the measures might not go far enough.

But here’s another sobering thought: What if we successfully guard our technological gems and yet remain vulnerable elsewhere? Think pharmaceuticals, biotech, shipbuilding, and more.

It’s no longer about just keeping adversaries out of our tech labs. It’s about understanding the entire supply chain, knowing where potential chokepoints are, and ensuring that neither states nor corporations can hold the U.S. to ransom.

For too long, the U.S. has viewed trade merely as a tool of policy, shying away from seeing it as an integral part of national security. The Biden administration seems to signal a departure from this ‘market-knows-best’ philosophy.

They recognize the need for government intervention to strengthen our industrial base, workforce, and defense. However, the roadmap remains elusive.

There will be naysayers, of course. Critics who claim such measures only exacerbate tensions. But here’s the bitter pill we all must swallow: these realities have always been in our periphery, stark and evident.

The West operated under the illusion that economic interests could be neatly separated from security concerns. China, in contrast, viewed them as intertwined.

Disclaimer: The information provided is not trading advice. Cryptopolitan.com holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decision.

文章来源于互联网:U.S. realizes national and economic security’s bond

Disclaimers:

1. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions and this info is not liable for any losses you may incur.

2. The copyright of this article belongs to the writer, it represents the writer's opinions only, not represents the site's ones. Not financial advice.

Previous 2023年8月14日 21:03
Next 2023年8月14日 22:47

Related articles

  • Here are the firms fueling the U.S. stock rally

    TL;DR Breakdown Despite recessionary fears and regional bank failures, the U.S. economy continues to grow, with the S&P 500 index rising more than 14% this year. The success is primarily driven by a few tech giants, creating an illusion of overall market health. The dominance of these firms is leading to market concentration and overvaluation risks. The biggest contributors to this rally are seven tech giants – Apple, Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Nvidia, Tesla, and Meta, with gains between 40% and 180% this year. In a surprising twist for financial markets, 2023 stands in stark contrast to expectations, defying the pessimistic forecasts of investors and analysts who entered the year bracing for an economic downfall in the U.S. Contrary to predictions, despite a series of regional bank failures and rising interest rates, the U.S. economy continues its growth trajectory. Fueling this wave of optimism is the S&P 500 index, the barometer for U.S. blue-chip stocks, which has surged upwards by more than 14% this year. Driving the rally: Tech heavyweights reign supreme However, a deeper dive into the elements behind this…

    Article 2023年6月18日
  • Vitalik Buterin transfers 600 Ether to Coinbase amid rising selling pressure on Ethereum

    TL;DR Breakdown Vitalik Buterin transferred 600 Ether (worth over $1 million) to Coinbase, sparking speculation about a potential sale. Ethereum faces increased selling pressure, and Buterin’s move might exacerbate this trend. Buterin has a history of transferring funds to exchanges; in March, he moved 200 ETH to Kraken and sold 439.25 Ether for alternative cryptocurrencies. Description Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has made headlines once again with a significant transaction. Earlier today, Buterin transferred 600 Ether, valued at over $1 million, from his wallet to the popular cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase. The reasons behind this move remain unclear, but such transfers are often interpreted as a precursor to a sale. Moreover, this transfer … Read more Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin has made headlines once again with a significant transaction. Earlier today, Buterin transferred 600 Ether, valued at over $1 million, from his wallet to the popular cryptocurrency exchange Coinbase. The reasons behind this move remain unclear, but such transfers are often interpreted as a precursor to a sale. Moreover, this transfer comes when selling pressure on Ethereum has been increasing. Consequently, Buterin’s…

    Article 2023年8月22日
  • Allegations Against Binance Raise Concerns Over User Funds and Regulatory Compliance

    TL;DR Breakdown Cinneamhain Ventures CEO accuses Binance of operating like a Ponzi scheme and making unauthorized decisions about user funds. Binance faces a lawsuit by the CFTC for alleged circumvention of US laws, inadequate safeguards against money laundering, and enabling illegal transactions. Description Cinneamhain Ventures CEO, Adam Cochran, recently took to Twitter to voice serious allegations against Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange. Cochran referred to Binance as a “Ponzi” scheme, claiming that the exchange has an evident “hole across multiple assets.” Drawing a comparison between Binance and FTX, Cochran stated that while user funds have not disappeared … Read more Cinneamhain Ventures CEO, Adam Cochran, recently took to Twitter to voice serious allegations against Binance, the world’s largest cryptocurrency exchange. Cochran referred to Binance as a “Ponzi” scheme, claiming that the exchange has an evident “hole across multiple assets.” Drawing a comparison between Binance and FTX, Cochran stated that while user funds have not disappeared entirely, customers should not be burdened with the consequences of CEO Changpeng Zhao’s alleged mistakes. Contents hide 1 CEO Accuses Binance of Unauthorized Use…

    Article 2023年7月12日
  • Gina Raimondo says U.S. still sees China as a friend

    Description In a world swamped by complex geopolitics and volatile economic shifts, it’s hard to decipher real intent. Yet, the recent visit by US Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo to China sent a clear signal to all stakeholders: America continues to view China as a partner. However, being a partner doesn’t always mean smooth sailing. Raimondo’s call … Read more In a world swamped by complex geopolitics and volatile economic shifts, it’s hard to decipher real intent. Yet, the recent visit by US Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo to China sent a clear signal to all stakeholders: America continues to view China as a partner. However, being a partner doesn’t always mean smooth sailing. Raimondo’s call to action Raimondo’s trip wasn’t just a mere formality. It marked the reopening of communication channels between the two superpowers. Despite this promising bridge-building, challenges persist. From intellectual property theft, state subsidies, to more contemporary issues like surprise office raids and murky data privacy laws, China’s business environment is not for the faint-hearted. Raimondo didn’t mince her words when she expressed concerns from the American business…

    Article 2023年8月30日
  • NYDFS virtual currency head leaves amid regulatory changes

    TL;DR Breakdown Peter Marton, the deputy superintendent of virtual currency at the New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS), is leaving his position, creating a vacancy in a key regulatory role. Marton had been instrumental in transforming the Virtual Currency Unit at NYDFS, which has been active in crypto regulation through its BitLicense program since 2015. The departure comes when NYDFS proposes new guidelines for crypto firms, including standards for risk assessment and coin listing, adding another layer of uncertainty to the regulatory landscape. Description Peter Marton, the Deputy Superintendent of Virtual Currency at the New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS), has announced his departure. Marton, who took on the role in December 2021, is set to leave the regulatory body, sparking questions about the future direction of cryptocurrency regulation in New York. Marton’s exit comes after a … Read more Peter Marton, the Deputy Superintendent of Virtual Currency at the New York State Department of Financial Services (NYDFS), has announced his departure. Marton, who took on the role in December 2021, is set to leave the…

    Article 2023年9月24日
TOP