OpenSea’s royalty enforcement tool Operator Filter to be turned off

TL;DR Breakdown

  • OpenSea, a prominent nonfungible token (NFT) marketplace, is discontinuing its Operator Filter, an on-chain royalty enforcement tool that enabled creators to blacklist NFT platforms that didn’t enforce royalty payments.
  • OpenSea faced resistance from creators who perceived the Operator Filter as infringing upon their control over the platforms on which their collections were sold.
  • Collections utilizing the tool, as well as existing collections on non-Ethereum blockchains, will enforce the creator’s chosen fees until February 29, 2024.

Description

OpenSea, a prominent nonfungible token (NFT) marketplace, is discontinuing its Operator Filter, an on-chain royalty enforcement tool. This tool enabled creators to blacklist NFT platforms that didn’t enforce royalty payments. OpenSea’s CEO, Devin Finzer, announced the change in an August 17 statement, with the implementation scheduled for August 31. The Operator Filter was introduced in … Read more

OpenSea, a prominent nonfungible token (NFT) marketplace, is discontinuing its Operator Filter, an on-chain royalty enforcement tool. This tool enabled creators to blacklist NFT platforms that didn’t enforce royalty payments. OpenSea’s CEO, Devin Finzer, announced the change in an August 17 statement, with the implementation scheduled for August 31.

The Operator Filter was introduced in November 2022 as a seemingly straightforward code snippet to limit NFT sales exclusively to marketplaces that upheld creator fees. Unfortunately, it didn’t achieve the anticipated success. Finzer cited inadequate support from the NFT ecosystem as a primary reason for this outcome.

Despite its intentions, the Operator Filter was bypassed by certain NFT platforms such as Blur, Dew, and LooksRare. They integrated the Seaport Protocol, sidestepping OpenSea’s blacklist and evading creator fees.

Opensea resistance from creators

OpenSea also faced resistance from creators who perceived the Operator Filter as infringing upon their control over the platforms on which their collections were sold. According to Finzer, creators expressed concerns that the tool compromised the decentralized ownership aspect of NFTs. He acknowledged the tension between enabling creator fees and preserving the principles of ownership.

Finzer emphasized that while creator fees were advantageous for specific business models, they constituted only one facet of creators’ potential revenue streams. He underscored the broader range of applications for NFT technology that need consideration, particularly regarding digital and physical redemption.

Commencing from August 31, the Operator Filter will cease to block any marketplaces. Nevertheless, collections utilizing the tool, as well as existing collections on non-Ethereum blockchains, will enforce the creator’s chosen fees until February 29, 2024. Finzer clarified that the removal of the Operator Filter didn’t signify the elimination of creator fees; it merely marked the end of an ineffective, one-sided enforcement approach.

The decision by OpenSea has drawn mixed reactions from the NFT community. Some view it as a potential setback for NFT artists seeking passive income. Certain community members expressed disappointment, suggesting that collectors should prioritize supporting NFT creators on platforms that enforce royalty obligations.

However, there are dissenting opinions as well. An avatar artist on Reddit believed that OpenSea’s decision might have been justified. They argued that the business model was perhaps profiting excessively from speculative trading, and discontinuing the Operator Filter could be a step towards rectifying this.

Disclaimer. The information provided is not trading advice. Cryptopolitan.com holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decisions.

文章来源于互联网:OpenSea’s royalty enforcement tool Operator Filter to be turned off

Disclaimers:

1. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions and this info is not liable for any losses you may incur.

2. The copyright of this article belongs to the writer, it represents the writer's opinions only, not represents the site's ones. Not financial advice.

Previous 2023年8月19日 03:57
Next 2023年8月19日 04:35

Related articles

  • Genesis parent company fails $630m payment to Gemini

    TL;DR Breakdown Digital Currency Group (DCG), Genesis Global Capital’s parent company, defaults on a $630 million payment to Gemini, amidst ongoing bankruptcy proceedings for Genesis. Cameron Winklevoss, Gemini CEO, threatens to sue Barry Silbert, DCG CEO, over repayment of a $900 million loan amid allegations of selling unregistered securities and mixed funds. Gemini is considering proposing an amended reorganization plan with Genesis that doesn’t require DCG’s approval, with negotiations between Gemini and DCG ongoing. A severe blow has hit Gemini, the cryptocurrency exchange, as the Digital Currency Group (DCG), the parent company of Genesis Global Capital, defaults on a payment to the tune of $630 million. This controversial financial misstep has intensified the turmoil between Gemini, headed by CEO Cameron Winklevoss, and DCG led by CEO Barry Silbert, creating an uncertain atmosphere within the digital currency realm. DCG’s missed payment comes amidst the backdrop of Genesis filing for Chapter 11 bankruptcy. The severity of the situation has escalated due to allegations of unregistered securities sales through the ‘Earn’ program and allegations of mixed funds. This development has led to the…

    Article 2023年5月23日
  • A half-million-dollar mistake: User pays $500,000 fee for a $200 bitcoin transaction

    TL;DR Breakdown A Bitcoin user mistakenly paid a record-breaking 19.89 Bitcoin (around $500,000) in transaction fees to transfer just 0.074 Bitcoin (approximately $200), making it the most expensive Bitcoin transaction fee ever in U.S. dollar terms. F2Pool, the mining pool that processed the transaction, has offered a three-day grace period for the sender to reclaim the exorbitant fee; otherwise, it will be distributed among F2Pool’s miners. Description In a jaw-dropping event that has left the cryptocurrency community astounded, an individual paid an exorbitant 19.89 Bitcoin (roughly $500,000) in transaction fees to transfer a paltry 0.074 Bitcoin (approximately $200). The transaction, executed on September 10, 2023, at 5:10 PM UTC, shattered previous records to become the most expensive Bitcoin transaction fee ever paid … Read more In a jaw-dropping event that has left the cryptocurrency community astounded, an individual paid an exorbitant 19.89 Bitcoin (roughly $500,000) in transaction fees to transfer a paltry 0.074 Bitcoin (approximately $200). The transaction, executed on September 10, 2023, at 5:10 PM UTC, shattered previous records to become the most expensive Bitcoin transaction fee ever paid…

    Article 2023年9月12日
  • Credit Suisse bondholders prepare lawsuit – The details

    TL;DR Breakdown Bondholders are planning to sue Switzerland in U.S. courts over Credit Suisse’s state-orchestrated rescue losses. The legal action is spearheaded by law firm Quinn Emanuel, which has experience in taking on nation-states in court. The crux of the lawsuit revolves around the controversial decision to eliminate $17bn of Credit Suisse’s bonds during the bank’s takeover by UBS. Description The smoke hasn’t cleared from the firestorm surrounding Credit Suisse’s state-sanctioned rescue, and already, the embers of discord are lighting up. Bondholders, having been burnt to the tune of billions, have girded their loins for a courtroom showdown against none other than the Swiss state itself. A Challenge to Swiss Sovereignty Law firm Quinn Emanuel … Read more The smoke hasn’t cleared from the firestorm surrounding Credit Suisse’s state-sanctioned rescue, and already, the embers of discord are lighting up. Bondholders, having been burnt to the tune of billions, have girded their loins for a courtroom showdown against none other than the Swiss state itself. A Challenge to Swiss Sovereignty Law firm Quinn Emanuel is orchestrating the bold move, readying a…

    Article 2023年9月16日
  • Thailand’s KBank launches $100 Million fund for Web3 and AI startups

    TL;DR Breakdown Thailand’s KBank has launched a $100 million venture capital fund, KXVC, managed by its tech subsidiary Kasikorn Business Technology Group, to invest in Web3 and AI startups globally. The fund aims to counter the declining investment volumes in the crypto venture capital market by focusing on high-growth startups in emerging technology sectors. KXVC’s global focus, covering the Asia Pacific, the U.S., the EU, and Israel, positions KBank as a leader in technological innovation and could set the stage for future advancements in Web3 and AI. Description Thailand’s financial giant, Kasikorn Bank, commonly known as KBank, has made a new move by earmarking $100 million for a venture capital fund. This fund, known as KXVC, is an initiative spearheaded by the bank’s technological division, Kasikorn Business Technology Group (KBTG). With a global reach that includes the Asia Pacific region, the United States, … Read more Thailand’s financial giant, Kasikorn Bank, commonly known as KBank, has made a new move by earmarking $100 million for a venture capital fund. This fund, known as KXVC, is an initiative spearheaded by the…

    Article 2023年9月15日
  • Cryptocurrency scam duo receives six-year prison terms in UK court verdict

    TL;DR Breakdown Ross Jay and Michael Freckleton were sentenced for cryptocurrency scams from 2015-2017. Fake cryptocurrency “Telecoin” is used to deceive investors with false promises of profits. Fraudsters accumulated £509,599 but never engaged in actual cryptocurrency trading. Description Two crypto fraudsters, Ross Jay and Michael Freckleton, have been sentenced by the Southwark Crown Court in the United Kingdom after being found guilty of orchestrating a cryptocurrency scam from 2015 to 2017. The duo used false promises of massive profits to deceive unsuspecting investors into investing in a fake cryptocurrency called “Telecoin.” Under the … Read more Two crypto fraudsters, Ross Jay and Michael Freckleton, have been sentenced by the Southwark Crown Court in the United Kingdom after being found guilty of orchestrating a cryptocurrency scam from 2015 to 2017. The duo used false promises of massive profits to deceive unsuspecting investors into investing in a fake cryptocurrency called “Telecoin.” Under the guise of a firm named Digi Ex, Jay, and Freckleton proactively solicited potential investors with enticing questions like, “How would you like to invest in a cryptocurrency called ‘Telecoin’?”…

    Article 2023年7月31日
TOP