OpenSea’s royalty enforcement tool Operator Filter to be turned off

TL;DR Breakdown

  • OpenSea, a prominent nonfungible token (NFT) marketplace, is discontinuing its Operator Filter, an on-chain royalty enforcement tool that enabled creators to blacklist NFT platforms that didn’t enforce royalty payments.
  • OpenSea faced resistance from creators who perceived the Operator Filter as infringing upon their control over the platforms on which their collections were sold.
  • Collections utilizing the tool, as well as existing collections on non-Ethereum blockchains, will enforce the creator’s chosen fees until February 29, 2024.

Description

OpenSea, a prominent nonfungible token (NFT) marketplace, is discontinuing its Operator Filter, an on-chain royalty enforcement tool. This tool enabled creators to blacklist NFT platforms that didn’t enforce royalty payments. OpenSea’s CEO, Devin Finzer, announced the change in an August 17 statement, with the implementation scheduled for August 31. The Operator Filter was introduced in … Read more

OpenSea, a prominent nonfungible token (NFT) marketplace, is discontinuing its Operator Filter, an on-chain royalty enforcement tool. This tool enabled creators to blacklist NFT platforms that didn’t enforce royalty payments. OpenSea’s CEO, Devin Finzer, announced the change in an August 17 statement, with the implementation scheduled for August 31.

The Operator Filter was introduced in November 2022 as a seemingly straightforward code snippet to limit NFT sales exclusively to marketplaces that upheld creator fees. Unfortunately, it didn’t achieve the anticipated success. Finzer cited inadequate support from the NFT ecosystem as a primary reason for this outcome.

Despite its intentions, the Operator Filter was bypassed by certain NFT platforms such as Blur, Dew, and LooksRare. They integrated the Seaport Protocol, sidestepping OpenSea’s blacklist and evading creator fees.

Opensea resistance from creators

OpenSea also faced resistance from creators who perceived the Operator Filter as infringing upon their control over the platforms on which their collections were sold. According to Finzer, creators expressed concerns that the tool compromised the decentralized ownership aspect of NFTs. He acknowledged the tension between enabling creator fees and preserving the principles of ownership.

Finzer emphasized that while creator fees were advantageous for specific business models, they constituted only one facet of creators’ potential revenue streams. He underscored the broader range of applications for NFT technology that need consideration, particularly regarding digital and physical redemption.

Commencing from August 31, the Operator Filter will cease to block any marketplaces. Nevertheless, collections utilizing the tool, as well as existing collections on non-Ethereum blockchains, will enforce the creator’s chosen fees until February 29, 2024. Finzer clarified that the removal of the Operator Filter didn’t signify the elimination of creator fees; it merely marked the end of an ineffective, one-sided enforcement approach.

The decision by OpenSea has drawn mixed reactions from the NFT community. Some view it as a potential setback for NFT artists seeking passive income. Certain community members expressed disappointment, suggesting that collectors should prioritize supporting NFT creators on platforms that enforce royalty obligations.

However, there are dissenting opinions as well. An avatar artist on Reddit believed that OpenSea’s decision might have been justified. They argued that the business model was perhaps profiting excessively from speculative trading, and discontinuing the Operator Filter could be a step towards rectifying this.

Disclaimer. The information provided is not trading advice. Cryptopolitan.com holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decisions.

文章来源于互联网:OpenSea’s royalty enforcement tool Operator Filter to be turned off

Disclaimers:

1. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions and this info is not liable for any losses you may incur.

2. The copyright of this article belongs to the writer, it represents the writer's opinions only, not represents the site's ones. Not financial advice.

Previous 2023年8月19日 03:57
Next 2023年8月19日 04:35

Related articles

  • Crypto scams on Twitter led to $872k in losses a year, new study finds

    TL;DR Breakdown A study finds crypto scams on Twitter made $872K through fake giveaways. Researchers built a system to automatically detect 95K+ scam Twitter lists. Findings show the need for better protection against social media crypto fraud. Description A new study has revealed that crypto scams made off with over $800,000 in one year by taking advantage of Twitter’s list feature to promote fake cryptocurrency giveaways. Crypto scams on Twitter led to over $872,000 in losses, according to the study conducted by researchers at San Diego State University. The researchers developed a system … Read more A new study has revealed that crypto scams made off with over $800,000 in one year by taking advantage of Twitter’s list feature to promote fake cryptocurrency giveaways. Crypto scams on Twitter led to over $872,000 in losses, according to the study conducted by researchers at San Diego State University. The researchers developed a system to automatically detect these crypto scams on Twitter. By analyzing user lists from June 2022 to June 2023, the system identified over 95,000 scam lists created by nearly 90,000…

    Article 2023年8月13日
  • Token founder swindled in $250k scam, points finger at Crypto.com

    TL;DR Breakdown Bryan Lawrence, the founder of Glow Token, has filed a lawsuit against Crypto.com after losing $250,000 and his home in a scam involving individuals posing as Crypto.com employees. He alleges negligence and a lack of security protocols on the part of the exchange. The lawsuit accuses Crypto.com of breach of contract and claims over $250,000 in damages. Lawrence’s situation has also led to health issues, with four hospitalizations for stomach problems attributed to stress from the events. Description Glow Token LLC has filed a lawsuit against major cryptocurrency exchange Crypto.com, seeking over $250,000 in damages after falling victim to an apparent scam. According to court documents, Glow Token CEO Bryan Lawrence was approached by individuals posing as Crypto.com employees, who deceived him into transferring funds for listing Glow’s cryptocurrency on the exchange. The … Read more Glow Token LLC has filed a lawsuit against major cryptocurrency exchange Crypto.com, seeking over $250,000 in damages after falling victim to an apparent scam. According to court documents, Glow Token CEO Bryan Lawrence was approached by individuals posing as Crypto.com employees, who…

    Article 2023年8月21日
  • South Korea Passes Inaugural Standalone Crypto Bill to Strengthen Investor Protection

    TL;DR Breakdown South Korea approved its inaugural standalone digital-asset bill, aimed at safeguarding investors and regulating the crypto sector after recent scandals. The legislation empowers the Financial Services Commission to oversee digital currency operators and mandates insurance coverage and reserve funds. Description In a significant move to bolster investor protection in the wake of several crypto scandals, South Korea has approved its first standalone digital-asset bill. The legislation comes just over a year after the collapse of tokens created by South Korean entrepreneur Do Kwon, which contributed to a $2 trillion crypto-market rout. The new law grants … Read more In a significant move to bolster investor protection in the wake of several crypto scandals, South Korea has approved its first standalone digital-asset bill. The legislation comes just over a year after the collapse of tokens created by South Korean entrepreneur Do Kwon, which contributed to a $2 trillion crypto-market rout. The new law grants the Financial Services Commission (FSC) the authority to oversee crypto operators and asset custodians while enabling the Bank of Korea to investigate these platforms. The…

    Article 2023年7月3日
  • Arbitrum price analysis: ARB slips back to a $1.15 margin after strong bearish run

    TL;DR Breakdown Arbitrum price analysis indicates a bearish trend ARB/USD prices have set support at $1.14 Arbitrum prices are facing resistance at $1.17 Arbitrum price analysis is indicating a decline in price today. The bears have won the leading position as the selling pressure has formed again and the price is decreasing again. The value of the token has dropped below $1.20 and is currently trading at around $1.15. The market sentiment for the Arbitrum token is bearish compared to the overall market sentiment, and it is expected to remain so in the near future. The sellers are still active and have been dominating the trading volume. This has caused a sharp decline in price as well. The 24-hour trading volume of the token has reached $175 million, and the market cap currently stands at $1.4 billion.  Arbitrum price analysis 1-day chart: ARB drops below $1.15 following a downward slide The 1-day Arbitrum price analysis reveals that it has failed to break above the $1.17 resistance level and continues to retrace. The token found strong support at the $1.14 mark,…

    Article 2023年6月5日
  • FrensTech deployer accused of $26K rug pull, first rug on Coinbase’s Base already?

    TL;DR Breakdown Uniswap developer and FrensTech deployer AzFlin is facing allegations of rug-pulling 14 ETH worth $26,000. AzFlin confirmed the project’s creation involvement but denied the accusation. Description Uniswap developer and FrensTech deployer AzFlin is facing allegations of rug-pulling 14 ETH, worth $26,000, from the FrensTech project on Base just four hours after launch. However, the developer has refuted the claims and asserted that he only removed 1 ETH liquidity that he had initially contributed to the project. FrensTech project rug-pulled on Base … Read more Uniswap developer and FrensTech deployer AzFlin is facing allegations of rug-pulling 14 ETH, worth $26,000, from the FrensTech project on Base just four hours after launch. However, the developer has refuted the claims and asserted that he only removed 1 ETH liquidity that he had initially contributed to the project. FrensTech project rug-pulled on Base According to UniswapVillain, the user who initially discovered the rug pull, they could track and identify AzFlin by analyzing the number of employees from Uniswap that followed the project on X. The user explained that AzFlin removed the ETH…

    Article 2023年8月13日
TOP