X (Twitter) gains major advantage because of this

TL;DR Breakdown

  • Zuckerberg introduced Threads to rival Twitter (X), initially gaining 44 million users.
  • Despite blunders by Musk on X, including visibility tweaks and a rise in ads, X remains dominant.
  • Threads’ pitch of being a peaceful alternative lacked the raw debate and drama that attracts users to X.

Description

Mark Zuckerberg’s competitive punch seemed to land perfectly with the introduction of Threads. An immediate threat to Twitter, now dubbed “X”, Threads zoomed past with a staggering 44 million daily active users. But, like many adrenaline-pumped stories, the dust settled, revealing Threads’ substantial user drop, dwindling to a mere 8 million. Yet, while Threads’ performance … Read more

Mark Zuckerberg’s competitive punch seemed to land perfectly with the introduction of Threads. An immediate threat to Twitter, now dubbed “X”, Threads zoomed past with a staggering 44 million daily active users.

But, like many adrenaline-pumped stories, the dust settled, revealing Threads’ substantial user drop, dwindling to a mere 8 million. Yet, while Threads’ performance ebbed, X’s inherent nature has shielded it, highlighting an interesting dynamic of the social media landscape.

Why X Still Dominates Despite Threads’ Initial Promise

When Elon Musk took control of X, the platform went through a whirlwind of change. Critics argue Musk’s alterations leaned more towards blunders than calculated moves.

He tweaked visibility parameters, making it difficult to view tweets and share links. He played with an increase in ads and nurtured a fertile ground for bots. And let’s not forget the rather awkward rebranding.

Any other brand, given this whirlwind of seemingly poor decisions, would have gone under. Yet X, a platform radiating with bustling chatter and debates, remains unparalleled. The prospect of joining live conversations about ongoing events is irresistible.

Mastodon and Bluesky, alternative platforms, have intricate usage dynamics, and Clubhouse’s popularity vanished almost as quickly as it surfaced. X remains the behemoth, the irreplaceable titan of rapid-fire public discourse.

Threads, however, did promise a glimmer of hope. It was simple, straightforward, and had the Meta advantage. Backed with a strong integration with Instagram, it had the sheer numbers to bolster its promise.

The platform sold itself as a tranquil escape, devoid of aggressive dialogues or vitriolic disputes. But herein lay its primary fault.

Why Threads Couldn’t Surpass X: The Mystery Unraveled

Two critical elements have kept X at the forefront, despite Threads’ initial momentum. Firstly, the very toxicity from which Threads sought to distance itself is the adrenaline that powers X. People crave real, raw, and sometimes unrefined debates.

The essence of drama, conflict, and the occasional fiery interaction is exactly what draws users to X. While Threads might have been the cleaner air to breathe, sometimes, there’s a perverse satisfaction in inhaling the smog, isn’t there?

The second factor is plain old inertia. Social media platforms thrive on their user base. A significant user mass is like a magnet, drawing even more towards it.

Platforms like X aren’t just about personal connections; they are arenas for public discourse, resonating with the opinions of a perceived majority. This illusion of ‘everyone is here’ is tantalizing. How horrendous must X become before user dissatisfaction topples this inertia?

The future remains uncertain. Threads is still under development and might revamp itself to overthrow X as the primary app for those craving rich information.

On the other hand, there’s potential for an evolved ecosystem of platforms, catering to distinct user preferences – be it ideological inclinations or preferred intensity of drama.

For the time being, X remains on its throne, maybe a little battered and beaten up, but certainly undefeated. Threads, Bluesky, and the likes may throw their punches, but X’s inherent magnetism appears too robust to waver.

It’s a peculiar world where imperfections become the allure. Elon Musk’s moves, no matter how controversial, can’t yet deter a user base hooked on the very essence of the platform. One can only wonder what will.

Disclaimer: The information provided is not trading advice. Cryptopolitan.com holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decision.

文章来源于互联网:X (Twitter) gains major advantage because of this

Disclaimers:

1. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions and this info is not liable for any losses you may incur.

2. The copyright of this article belongs to the writer, it represents the writer's opinions only, not represents the site's ones. Not financial advice.

Previous 2023年8月20日 13:16
Next 2023年8月20日 20:09

Related articles

  • Microsoft and CoreWeave join forces to unleash AI and cryptocurrency revolution

    TL;DR Breakdown Microsoft has partnered with CoreWeave, to explore the convergence of AI and the cryptocurrency industry. The collaboration aims to leverage cloud computing infrastructure to drive technological innovation. CoreWeave has expanded its expertise beyond Ethereum mining and is valued at $2 billion. In a groundbreaking move that showcases the ongoing convergence of artificial intelligence (AI) and the cryptocurrency industry, Microsoft has forged a transformative partnership with CoreWeave, a prominent former Ethereum miner. The collaboration aims to unlock unprecedented potential by harnessing the power of cloud computing infrastructure and advancing the boundaries of technological innovation. Emerging as one of the fastest-growing providers in the industry, CoreWeave has rapidly expanded its expertise beyond Ethereum mining. Recently valued at an impressive $2 billion, the company has attracted significant attention for its forward-thinking approach and commitment to pushing the technological envelope. While the financial specifics of the Microsoft-CoreWeave deal remain undisclosed, inside sources familiar with the matter have indicated that the tech giant has committed to a multi-year investment worth billions of dollars. This strategic move demonstrates Microsoft’s unwavering dedication to fostering groundbreaking…

    Article 2023年6月7日
  • North Korean Hackers, Lazarus group, tied to the Atomic Wallet breach

    TL;DR Breakdown Elliptic Firm and its Investigative arm say that users of Atomic Wallet have fallen victim to Lazarus, the notorious North Korean cybercrime group.  So far, $35 million has been stolen in bitcoin, ether, tether, Dogecoin, Litecoin, BNB coin, polygon, and Tron-based USDT. The stolen assets are being laundered using specific services, such as the Sinbad mixer, which has also been used to launder the proceeds of Lazarus Group Hacks in the past. Elliptic, a blockchain intelligence firm, said in a blog post on Tuesday that users of Atomic Wallet may have fallen victim to Lazarus, the notorious North Korean cybercrime group. Reportedly, illegal funds from the $35 million Atomic Wallet hack have been transferred to a crypto aggregator that is favored by North Korea’s most notorious cyber-hacking group. The Lazarus Group financial terror hits the crypto industry hard Lazarus Group is a North Korean cybercrime organization known for its cyber exploits, and it has been blamed for a number of attacks since 2010. The entity is thought to be funded by the North Korean government and consists of…

    Article 2023年6月12日
  • Celsius takes StakeHound to court, alleges $150 million token debacle

    TL;DR Breakdown   Celsius files a lawsuit against StakeHound, claiming $150M in unpaid tokens. StakeHound argues it is not obligated to swap tokens or return lost ETH. The dispute highlights challenges and complexities in the crypto space. Description Celsius, a defunct cryptocurrency lender, has taken legal action against StakeHound, a liquid staking platform, alleging the failure to repay approximately $150 million in various tokens, including Ethereum (ETH), Polygon’s MATIC, and Polkadot‘s DOT. According to court documents, Celsius provided StakeHound with significant amounts of staked native ETH, MATIC, and DOT between 2020 and 2021, … Read more Celsius, a defunct cryptocurrency lender, has taken legal action against StakeHound, a liquid staking platform, alleging the failure to repay approximately $150 million in various tokens, including Ethereum (ETH), Polygon’s MATIC, and Polkadot‘s DOT. According to court documents, Celsius provided StakeHound with significant amounts of staked native ETH, MATIC, and DOT between 2020 and 2021, which were subsequently exchanged for StakeHound’s “stTokens.” In response to Celsius’ claims, StakeHound initiated an arbitration agreement in Switzerland after Celsius filed for bankruptcy in the United States. StakeHound…

    Article 2023年7月12日
  • Ripple CLO Accuses SEC of “Political Power Play” in Crypto Security War

    TL;DR Breakdown Ripple’s General Counsel accuses the SEC of a “political power play” in its aggressive crackdown on the crypto industry, arguing that the regulator lacks jurisdiction over certain cryptocurrencies like XRP. The SEC’s lawsuit against Ripple has sparked uncertainty in the crypto market, with XRP’s classification as security remaining a central point of contention. Description In a heated exchange on social media, Ripple Labs Inc’s General Counsel, Stuart Alderoty, launched a scathing attack on the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) over its relentless efforts to crack down on the cryptocurrency ecosystem through what he perceives as a politically motivated “security war.” The dispute centers around the SEC’s classification … Read more In a heated exchange on social media, Ripple Labs Inc’s General Counsel, Stuart Alderoty, launched a scathing attack on the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) over its relentless efforts to crack down on the cryptocurrency ecosystem through what he perceives as a politically motivated “security war.” The dispute centers around the SEC’s classification of certain cryptocurrencies as securities, leading to legal battles and regulatory…

    Article 2023年7月24日
  • Binance lawyers fire back at SEC’s restraining order, citing customer risk and business consequences

    TL;DR Breakdown Binance lawyers strongly oppose SEC’s restraining order, citing a lack of immediate risk to customer assets. Concerns raised by the SEC have already caused harm, argue Binance’s legal representatives. Strained banking relationships force Binance.US to shift to a cryptocurrency-only model. Lawyers representing Binance and its associated firms have vehemently opposed the restraining order sought by the U.S. Securities Exchange Commission (SEC) in a recent court filing on June 12. The SEC had charged Binance and related companies with various allegations on June 5 and subsequently requested a restraining order against Binance.US—the order aimed to freeze the company’s assets and enforce the return of user funds. In their response, Binance’s legal representatives questioned the necessity of the SEC’s requested relief, arguing that the SEC failed to demonstrate any immediate risk to customer assets. They further emphasized that the concerns raised by the SEC had already initiated the harm the regulatory body aims to safeguard against. Of particular concern was the reported threat by banking partners of Binance.US’s parent company, BAM Trading, to restrict access to corporate and customer assets….

    Article 2023年6月16日
TOP