China is criticizing US’s strategies harshly – The details

Description

Recent maneuvers from the US, with its blend of diplomacy and containment, are drawing the ire of China’s formidable intelligence arm. The looming question now is whether this brewing tension jeopardizes the anticipated November summit between the two superpowers. Veiled Threats and Impending Summits Amid the backdrop of alleged US attempts to warm bilateral ties, … Read more

Recent maneuvers from the US, with its blend of diplomacy and containment, are drawing the ire of China’s formidable intelligence arm. The looming question now is whether this brewing tension jeopardizes the anticipated November summit between the two superpowers.

Veiled Threats and Impending Summits

Amid the backdrop of alleged US attempts to warm bilateral ties, China’s Ministry of State Security (MSS) has delivered its most trenchant response yet.

With a series of American officials, including the US Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo, knocking on Beijing’s doors recently, the narrative from Washington remains consistent: the Biden administration isn’t attempting to throttle China’s progression or strive for a disentanglement.

Yet, the Chinese ministry swiftly countered this narrative by equating it to “old wine in new bottles,” alluding to the continued US endorsement of arms deals and financial backing to Taiwan—a region over which China has long asserted its sovereignty.

However, the MSS didn’t stop at Taiwan. They went further, alleging the US of sowing discord in areas like the South China Sea and Tibet.

Moreover, there’s the underlying issue of the US’s denunciation of what they termed as the forceful assimilation of a significant Tibetan child population into government-overseen boarding institutions.

Coupled with these geopolitical tussles, China took umbrage at the US’s negative portrayal of the Chinese economic landscape. The recent label by President Joe Biden, depicting China as a “ticking timebomb” owing to its decelerated economic expansion, hasn’t gone unnoticed in Beijing.

Now, all eyes are fixated on the Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation forum set to take place in San Francisco this November. This event could witness the first face-to-face interaction between President Xi Jinping and Biden since their last rendezvous at the G20 in Bali.

However, there’s an air of uncertainty. The MSS’s stance is unambiguous: for a genuine progression “From Bali to San Francisco”, the US must exhibit genuine earnestness.

The Undercurrents of Bilateral Tensions

Since the resurrection of diplomatic ties in 1979, the US’s modus operandi towards China has oscillated between fostering connections and enforcing restrictions.

The recent slew of visits by key American dignitaries, such as Secretary of State Antony Blinken and Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen, suggests Washington’s eagerness to thaw relations and bolster dialogue.

Raimondo’s recent journey to Beijing was particularly noteworthy. Despite expressing her contentment over constructive interactions with Chinese officials, she didn’t shy away from calling out Beijing on the mounting challenges faced by US enterprises in China.

From seemingly arbitrary penalties to abrupt police interventions in corporate spaces and the introduction of new legislation surrounding espionage and data – the challenges are multifaceted.

Yet, the stance of the MSS remains defiant. Their perspective is unwavering: both the Trump and Biden tenures have consistently ratcheted up efforts to economically disentangle and encircle China.

Such strategies, they contend, are fated to crumble. In their view, the tides of history are not flowing in America’s favor. The renaissance of the Chinese nation, they argue, has embarked on an unalterable trajectory.

It’s worth noting that, in a move underscoring China’s assertiveness, President Xi Jinping has opted out of the forthcoming G20 leaders’ conference in New Delhi. This decision marks the first instance of him giving a miss to such a conclave since his ascension to power nearly a decade ago.

To surmise, the US-China dynamics are convoluted, with both powers seeking leverage on the global stage. While Washington seems eager to mend fences, Beijing remains wary, demanding more than just “beautiful words.” The ball, it appears, is firmly in the US’s court.

Disclaimer: The information provided is not trading advice. Cryptopolitan.com holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decision.

文章来源于互联网:China is criticizing US’s strategies harshly – The details

Disclaimers:

1. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions and this info is not liable for any losses you may incur.

2. The copyright of this article belongs to the writer, it represents the writer's opinions only, not represents the site's ones. Not financial advice.

Previous 2023年9月5日 11:33
Next 2023年9月5日 18:53

Related articles

  • Reviving the Blocksize Wars: How the struggle for salability continues to resonate in the Bitcoin world

    TL;DR Breakdown The blocksize debate remains a significant topic within the Bitcoin community, highlighting the ongoing challenge of achieving scalability while maintaining decentralization. Different factions in the Bitcoin community have varying perspectives on the blocksize issue. Some advocate for increasing the blocksize to accommodate more transactions per block, while others prioritize keeping the blocksize limited to preserve decentralization and network security. The Blocksize Debate emerged as a result of the growing popularity of Bitcoin and the increasing strain it placed on the network’s capacity. At the heart of the issue was the block size limit, a parameter that restricts the number of transactions that can be included in a single block. Bitcoin’s original block size limit was set at 1 megabyte (MB), but as transaction volumes surged, concerns arose regarding scalability and the network’s ability to handle larger transaction volumes efficiently. Contents hide 1 The Factions: Big Blocks vs. Small Blocks 1.1 1. Big Blocks: 1.2 2. Small Blocks: 2 The scaling debate intensifies 2.1 1. Segregated Witness (SegWit): 2.2 2. Bitcoin Unlimited: 3 Forks and Divisions 3.1 1. Network…

    Article 2023年5月19日
  • XRP faces centralization claims following its court success

    TL;DR Breakdown Blockchain experts have once again leveled claims of centralization against XRP following its court success against the SEC. Ripple explains the token’s role in the crypto sector. Description Last week’s partial court victory for Ripple Labs against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) provided a sense of relief for the XRP Ledger project, which has long been under a regulatory cloud. However, criticisms from blockchain purists persist, claiming that XRPL’s technological design makes it too centralized compared to other blockchains. Experts argue … Read more Last week’s partial court victory for Ripple Labs against the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) provided a sense of relief for the XRP Ledger project, which has long been under a regulatory cloud. However, criticisms from blockchain purists persist, claiming that XRPL’s technological design makes it too centralized compared to other blockchains. Experts argue about XRPL’s design Derived from Bitcoin but based on early 2000s concepts, XRPL operates with a trade-off that allows a smaller group of “validators” or key operators to control its central transaction-processing mechanism. This centralization grants benefits…

    Article 2023年7月21日
  • Crypto Broker FPG Hit by $20M Cyberattack, Freezes Withdrawals for Investor Protection

    TL;DR Breakdown Floating Point Group (FPG) has suspended trading, withdrawals, and deposits following a cyberattack that caused an estimated loss of $15-20 million. The incident exacerbates existing challenges faced by the institutional crypto sector, including declining market conditions and increased regulatory scrutiny. Cryptocurrency brokerage firm Floating Point Group (FPG) has been forced to suspend trading, withdrawals, and deposits following a significant security breach, resulting in an estimated loss of between $15 million and $20 million. The attack, which occurred on June 11, has raised concerns about the safety of institutional investments in the crypto sector. FPG, an international brokerage firm catering to institutional clients, manages assets worth $50 billion. The incident adds to the growing challenges faced by the crypto market, including regulatory scrutiny and declining market conditions. Contents hide 1 Security Breach Forces FPG to Halt Operations 2 Institutional Crypto Sector Faces Mounting Challenges 3 FPG Collaborates with Authorities to Recover Assets 4 Conclusion Security Breach Forces FPG to Halt Operations Floating Point Group confirmed that it had fallen victim to a cyberattack on June 11, prompting the company…

    Article 2023年6月18日
  • Atomic Wallet efforts to track and revert stolen funds

    TL;DR Breakdown Atomic Wallet and blockchain investigators have been working diligently to track and return the stolen funds. The company claims that less than 1% of its monthly active users were affected. Despite the Company’s official announcement, some users were still reporting losses at the time of writing. A recent hack targeting Atomic Wallet resulted in the theft of $35 million from its users since June 2. However, the company claims that less than 1% of its monthly active users were affected. Following the attack, Atomic Wallet and blockchain investigators have been working diligently to track and return the stolen funds. Exploiting the situation, several verified scam Twitter accounts impersonated Atomic Wallet and shared phishing links, falsely promising to assist users in recovering their lost funds. Despite Atomic Wallet’s official announcement, some users were still reporting losses at the time of writing. The community criticized the company for downplaying the extent of the damage, as users believed the hacker primarily targeted wallets with substantial funds. At the moment less than 1% of our monthly active users have been affected/reported. Last…

    Article 2023年6月9日
  • Hong Kong has some big dreams for web3

    TL;DR Breakdown Hong Kong’s Financial Secretary, Paul Chan Mo-po, is championing the potential of Web3 technology. Web3 promises innovations like NFTs, GameFi, and Play-to-Earn gaming, reshaping digital entertainment. Cyberport, a tech hub in Hong Kong, is positioned as a hotbed for Web3 innovations with significant funding and over 180 tech companies. Description Bold ambitions are pulsing through Hong Kong’s tech hubs. Hong Kong’s financial compass, Paul Chan Mo-po, isn’t one to let sleeping dogs lie, especially when the future of the digital realm is unfolding right before our eyes. At the forefront of the digital revolution, Hong Kong stands tall, yearning for what the Web3 era has … Read more Bold ambitions are pulsing through Hong Kong’s tech hubs. Hong Kong’s financial compass, Paul Chan Mo-po, isn’t one to let sleeping dogs lie, especially when the future of the digital realm is unfolding right before our eyes. At the forefront of the digital revolution, Hong Kong stands tall, yearning for what the Web3 era has to offer. The Future of Digital Entertainment: More Than Just Pixels Web3 isn’t just another…

    Article 2023年8月29日
TOP