Virtual assets included in UAE terrorist financing and proliferation red flag list guidance

TL;DR Breakdown

  • Red flags identified include virtual assets exchanged in territories where sanctioned people have influence or sanctioned jurisdictions.
  • Red flag indicators regarding the use of virtual assets to send funds to a few select wallets at unregulated virtual assets exchanges (or exchanges in territories where sanctioned people have influence or sanctioned jurisdictions).

Description

In September 2023, the UAE Executive office for Control and Nonproliferation published a guidance providing consolidated list of terrorist financing (TF) and proliferation financing (PF) red flags that include provisions related to virtual assets. According to the published document, the purpose is to provide a consolidated list1 of Terrorist Financing (TF) and Proliferation Financing (PF) … Read more

In September 2023, the UAE Executive office for Control and Nonproliferation published a guidance providing consolidated list of terrorist financing (TF) and proliferation financing (PF) red flags that include provisions related to virtual assets.

According to the published document, the purpose is to provide a consolidated list1 of Terrorist Financing (TF) and Proliferation Financing (PF) red flags that aim to assist financial institutions (FIs), designated non-financial businesses & professions (DNFBPs), and virtual asset service providers (VASPs) in identifying and detecting suspicious TF and PF activities, including those that may be related to the evasion of targeted financial sanctions (TFS) imposed under United Nations Security Council Resolutions (UNSCRs) or by local designations.

Red flags identified include for example carrying out of multiple ATM cash withdrawals in short succession in territories on the border of sanctioned countries; as well as virtual assets exchanged in territories where sanctioned people have influence or sanctioned jurisdictions.

The document also discusses requirements of financial institutions, DNFBPS and VASPs ( Virtual asset service providers) to put in place indicators that can be used to identify suspicions that may indicate illicit activities and update those indicators on an ongoing basis.

The document recommends that FIs, DNFBPs, and VASPs update their screening systems with the latest red flags and indicators in order to be able to better identify and detect unusual or suspicious transactions and activities.

This would include red flag indicators regarding the use of virtual assets to send funds to a few select wallets at unregulated virtual assets exchanges (or exchanges in territories where sanctioned people have influence or sanctioned jurisdictions).

In addition to the transfer of funds to a virtual assets exchange’s operational banking account (to fund a virtual asset wallet) followed by the crypto-to-fiat conversion (either more or less) from the same exchange within a relatively short period of time.

The guidance comes after The UAE Central Bank has issued its long awaited virtual assets and virtual assets service provider framework under the umbrella of a new guidance on anti-money laundering and combating the financing of terrorism (AML/CFT) for licensed financial institutions (LFIs) with a focus on the risks of dealing with virtual assets.

The UAE Central Bank has clarified what is considers as virtual assets and who can offer services in this realm, as well as how banks and financial institutions will work with VASPs when it comes to opening accounts for them and meeting compliance requirements. It also makes clear that virtual assets are not considered a legal tender in the UAE.

The UAE while working to build its crypto economy and ecosystem is keen to meet FATF requirements. This is also clear in VARA’s latest virtual asset rulebookfor, the virtual assets transfer, and settlement service. As published in the rulebook, VASPs providing VA Transfer and Settlement Services must comply with all applicable legal and regulatory requirements issued by the Central Bank of UAE which apply to the VASP, which pertain to the end-to-end enablement of payments, remittances and/or other related services as may be amended from time to time.

VASPs providing VA Transfer and Settlement Services must ensure that they comply with all legal and regulatory requirements for such services, inside and outside of the UAE. VASPs must ensure at all times that any transmission or transfer, and/or settlement being undertaken is permissible and can be facilitated through, and concluded in, all jurisdictions that are relevant to that transmission or transfer, and/or settlement.

The VASPs also have to comply with the compliance and risk management rulebook. VASPs providing VA Transfer and Settlement Services must comply with all requirements with respect to AML/CFT contained in that Rulebook, including but not limited to FATF-specific compliance requirements such as the Travel Rule.

In conclusion, the UAE is preparing itself to accept virtual assets while continuing to adhere to international regulations and requirements.

The information provided is not trading advice. Cryptopolitan.com holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decisions.

文章来源于互联网:Virtual assets included in UAE terrorist financing and proliferation red flag list guidance

Disclaimers:

1. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions and this info is not liable for any losses you may incur.

2. The copyright of this article belongs to the writer, it represents the writer's opinions only, not represents the site's ones. Not financial advice.

Previous 2023年9月9日 13:06
Next 2023年9月9日 14:21

Related articles

  • Multichain (MULTI) team locked out as CEO goes missing

    TL;DR Breakdown Multichain is facing operational issues due to inability to contact their CEO, Zhaojun, who holds crucial server access permissions. Issues affecting their protocol include a problem with the scanning node network of Router5, disrupting cross-chain services. The team has suspended services for over 10 chains to protect users’ interests. Amidst this, unconfirmed rumors surfaced on Twitter of Chinese police arresting the Multichain team and confiscating $1.5 billion in smart contract funds. The turbulence surrounding Multichain (MULTI), a popular cross-chain protocol, hit a new peak as the team recently reported their inability to contact CEO Zhaojun, the sole possessor of critical server access permissions. This sudden halt in operations coincides with unverified rumors of police arrests and substantial confiscation of funds. Server access crisis paralyzes operations Multichain’s team took to Twitter, explaining the trials they’ve been grappling with, which have manifested in multifaceted issues plaguing their protocol. Among these, a standout problem lies with the scanning node network of Router5. This complication has disrupted the standard cross-chain service of several chains, with the team’s hands being tied due to…

    Article 2023年6月4日
  • Binance wants to leave Russia for shocking reason

    TL;DR Breakdown Binance contemplates withdrawing services from Russia due to U.S. sanctions. The crypto exchange recently delisted select Russian banks and imposed currency restrictions. Other platforms like Bybit and OKX also reconsider their Russian engagements. Russia plans to introduce digital rubles by 2027. Description Binance, a behemoth in the cryptocurrency exchange realm, seems ready to make an audacious move – possibly withdrawing its extensive services from Russia. This comes amidst escalating sanctions, with the United States leading the charge against the crypto giant. Mounting Global Pressures The undercurrents of Binance‘s contemplation could be felt long before it became public … Read more Binance, a behemoth in the cryptocurrency exchange realm, seems ready to make an audacious move – possibly withdrawing its extensive services from Russia. This comes amidst escalating sanctions, with the United States leading the charge against the crypto giant. Mounting Global Pressures The undercurrents of Binance‘s contemplation could be felt long before it became public knowledge. Just recently, the exchange made the strategic decision to delist certain Russian financial establishments from its peer-to-peer payment platform. This meant not…

    Article 2023年8月30日
  • Ethereum left in Bitcoin’s dust as SEC lingers

    TL;DR Breakdown Ethereum’s performance is being affected by regulatory uncertainties, making it lag behind Bitcoin. The SEC is yet to decide if Ether will be classified as an unregistered security, which can complicate its trading process. Bitcoin, treated as a commodity, has seen an increase in value due to investor flight from regulatory risk and anticipation of new Bitcoin exchange-traded funds. Description As the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) casts a vigilant gaze over the evolving world of cryptocurrency, the regulatory future of Ethereum, the second-largest digital currency, hangs in balance. Analysts indicate this uncertainty is hindering Ether’s progress, causing it to lag behind the market leader, Bitcoin. The crux of the regulatory ambiguity centers around … Read more As the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) casts a vigilant gaze over the evolving world of cryptocurrency, the regulatory future of Ethereum, the second-largest digital currency, hangs in balance. Analysts indicate this uncertainty is hindering Ether’s progress, causing it to lag behind the market leader, Bitcoin. The crux of the regulatory ambiguity centers around whether the SEC will classify…

    Article 2023年6月29日
  • Crypto exchange Bybit exits Canada amid regulatory challenges

    TL;DR Breakdown Cryptocurrency exchange Bybit announces suspending its products and services in Canada, citing recent regulatory developments. Bybit’s decision follows similar moves by other exchanges, including Binance, as they navigate the challenging regulatory landscape in Canada. While exchanges like Coinbase remain committed to the Canadian market, Bybit joins the platforms that pause operations due to new guidelines requiring approval and due diligence checks for crypto asset trading platforms. Cryptocurrency exchange Bybit has decided to pause its products and services for residents and nationals of Canada, citing recent regulatory developments in the country. The move follows the footsteps of other exchanges, including Binance, that have exited the Canadian market due to a challenging regulatory environment. Bybit takes pause in the Canadian market Bybit stated in a blog post on Tuesday that its primary objective has always been to comply with relevant rules and regulations in Canada. However, given the recent regulatory developments, the exchange has made the difficult decision to halt the availability of its products and services temporarily. Starting from May 31, new account openings will be unavailable, while existing…

    Article 2023年6月3日
  • Alameda Research’s continued battle with Grayscale investments

    TL;DR Breakdown Alameda Research challenges Grayscale over fee structures and redemption bans, alleging a 90% devaluation of their shares. Grayscale’s recent court victory against the SEC might make the crypto firm’s redemption requests moot if GBTC converts to an ETF. Description The ongoing legal tussle between Alameda Research and Grayscale Investments has taken another twist. Alameda Research, founded by Sam Bankman-Fried and a debtor affiliate of cryptocurrency exchange FTX, recently amended its complaint against the crypto titan, Grayscale. Last Friday, Alameda, despite previously expressing intentions to add co-plaintiffs, remained as the sole plaintiff in the updated … Read more The ongoing legal tussle between Alameda Research and Grayscale Investments has taken another twist. Alameda Research, founded by Sam Bankman-Fried and a debtor affiliate of cryptocurrency exchange FTX, recently amended its complaint against the crypto titan, Grayscale. Last Friday, Alameda, despite previously expressing intentions to add co-plaintiffs, remained as the sole plaintiff in the updated filing. The amendment was a result of the firm’s inability to secure the desired number of co-plaintiffs for its case against Grayscale. It should be noted…

    Article 2023年9月20日
TOP