U.S. realizes national and economic security’s bond

TL;DR Breakdown

  • U.S. recognizes the interconnectedness of national and economic security.
  • White House issues order to limit tech investments in China.
  • Focus is on expertise transfer, not just capital.

Description

For years, the U.S. operated under a seemingly clear distinction: national security was one pillar, and economic stability was another. Yet, the blurring lines between economic and national interests now challenge this compartmentalized view. The United States is waking up to a reality that other major players, particularly China, have recognized for a long time: … Read more

For years, the U.S. operated under a seemingly clear distinction: national security was one pillar, and economic stability was another. Yet, the blurring lines between economic and national interests now challenge this compartmentalized view.

The United States is waking up to a reality that other major players, particularly China, have recognized for a long time: national security and economic security are two sides of the same coin.

The Tech Split and Its Underlying Motives

When it comes to technological prowess, China’s relentless march forward has not gone unnoticed in the West.

With the recent executive order from the White House, the U.S. has taken a decisive step to decouple from China in high-risk technological sectors like semiconductors, quantum computing, and artificial intelligence.

The reason? Simple. It’s one thing to engage in healthy competition; it’s another to inadvertently bolster the military and strategic prowess of a potential adversary.

But here’s the catch: this move isn’t just about money. If you think it’s about the billions of dollars in investments, you’re missing the bigger picture. This is about expertise and intellectual capital – the patents, data, software, and other IP.

It’s one thing to pour money into a venture, but it’s another to inadvertently transfer the very innovations that could tilt the balance of power in an increasingly bipolar world.

Let’s not kid ourselves. The drop in U.S. dollar funding for China-focused venture capital from a whopping $95bn in 2021 to a mere $14bn in 2022 wasn’t just a market hiccup. It was a deliberate recalibration. The newest executive mandate will tighten the noose even further.

The Broader Challenge: Redefining Boundaries

Now, the crux of the matter lies in determining the limits. It’s like setting up a fence in your yard – how small should the yard be and how high should the fence go? Consider technologies like artificial intelligence.

Today, AI can either revolutionize the music industry or wreak havoc on our financial systems. Where do we draw the line? As the White House wrangles with these questions, they’ve turned to stakeholders from all walks of life.

The feedback, though diverse, shows a significant alignment, especially among tech giants. However, some believe the measures might not go far enough.

But here’s another sobering thought: What if we successfully guard our technological gems and yet remain vulnerable elsewhere? Think pharmaceuticals, biotech, shipbuilding, and more.

It’s no longer about just keeping adversaries out of our tech labs. It’s about understanding the entire supply chain, knowing where potential chokepoints are, and ensuring that neither states nor corporations can hold the U.S. to ransom.

For too long, the U.S. has viewed trade merely as a tool of policy, shying away from seeing it as an integral part of national security. The Biden administration seems to signal a departure from this ‘market-knows-best’ philosophy.

They recognize the need for government intervention to strengthen our industrial base, workforce, and defense. However, the roadmap remains elusive.

There will be naysayers, of course. Critics who claim such measures only exacerbate tensions. But here’s the bitter pill we all must swallow: these realities have always been in our periphery, stark and evident.

The West operated under the illusion that economic interests could be neatly separated from security concerns. China, in contrast, viewed them as intertwined.

Disclaimer: The information provided is not trading advice. Cryptopolitan.com holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decision.

文章来源于互联网:U.S. realizes national and economic security’s bond

Disclaimers:

1. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions and this info is not liable for any losses you may incur.

2. The copyright of this article belongs to the writer, it represents the writer's opinions only, not represents the site's ones. Not financial advice.

Previous 2023年8月14日 21:03
Next 2023年8月14日 22:47

Related articles

  • SEC Staff Emails Reveal XRP Failed Howey Test, Questioning SEC’s Allegations

    TL;DR Breakdown Newly revealed SEC staff emails suggest that Ripple’s XRP may not meet the criteria to be considered a security, contradicting the SEC’s allegations. The court’s decision to make documents related to the Hinman Speech public could provide insights into why Ether was classified as a non-security In a dramatic twist to the ongoing legal battle between Ripple Labs and the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), newly revealed SEC staff emails have raised questions about the regulatory agency’s allegations against Ripple’s XRP cryptocurrency. Attorney John Deaton, who represents XRP holders, brought attention to a footnote in Ripple’s court briefs, which suggests that XRP may not satisfy the Howey Test and, therefore, should not be considered a security.  The revelation has sparked concerns about the SEC’s actions and their alignment with their own staff’s analysis. Additionally, the court’s decision to reject the SEC’s motion to seal documents related to the Hinman Speech has heightened anticipation within the cryptocurrency industry, as these memos could provide insights into why Ether (ETH) was deemed not to be a security. Footnote Raises Doubts…

    Article 2023年5月22日
  • Digital currencies’ unwanted role in the culture wars

    Description Amid the growing political turbulence and societal divisions of our age, a new player has entered the arena: cryptocurrencies, or more specifically, Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). As nations from China to Nigeria embrace digital currencies, their true implications in the modern world raise eyebrows and fuel conspiracy theories. From Wonkish Debate to Political Hot … Read more Amid the growing political turbulence and societal divisions of our age, a new player has entered the arena: cryptocurrencies, or more specifically, Central Bank Digital Currencies (CBDCs). As nations from China to Nigeria embrace digital currencies, their true implications in the modern world raise eyebrows and fuel conspiracy theories. From Wonkish Debate to Political Hot Potato Just a handful of years ago, CBDCs were largely confined to the hallowed halls of financial institutions and policy discussions. Their purpose seemed simple enough: a digital representation of tangible currency, backed not by private companies but by the weight of national central banks. Fast forward to today, and CBDCs have morphed into political footballs. Across the globe, over 100 nations are contemplating the CBDC…

    Article 2023年9月7日
  • ECB’s conundrum: To raise rates or not to raise rates?

    Description The corridors of the European Central Bank (ECB) have been echoing with one critical debate recently: should they hike the interest rates yet again? It’s a double-edged sword, and the pressure is palpable. A Fractured Consensus Last year, the consensus was evident. The ECB, aiming to stifle inflation, had incrementally hiked rates by 4.25 percentage … Read more The corridors of the European Central Bank (ECB) have been echoing with one critical debate recently: should they hike the interest rates yet again? It’s a double-edged sword, and the pressure is palpable. A Fractured Consensus Last year, the consensus was evident. The ECB, aiming to stifle inflation, had incrementally hiked rates by 4.25 percentage points since July 2022. But now, the very fabric of that consensus seems to be unraveling. With whispers of a looming eurozone recession becoming louder and the annual price growth now a mere shadow of its former 10.6% self, the unified direction of the bank’s trajectory seems to be on shaky grounds. Within the inner sanctum of the bank, the governors appear divided. While some are…

    Article 2023年9月13日
  • Liquity price analysis: LQTY makes a good ascent after a strong leap to $1.28

    TL;DR Breakdown Liquity price analysis shows a bullish market sentiment LQTY prices are facing resistance at $1.32 Key support for LQTY prices is seen $1.25 Liquity price analysis for today shows an upward trend in the market. The bulls  are in control at the moment and  a bullish run is expected in the coming days. The LQTY/USD pair price has rallied from $1.2621 to around $1.29 for the last 24 hours and we expect it to stay above the resistance level of $1.32 in the coming days. If the price breaks above the key resistance level, the Liquity price to follow and increase further in the coming days.  On the other hand, if the market sentiment changes falls below the $1.25 support level then the LQTY price may also follow a bearish trend. Liquity has increased by 3.05 percent and is currently trading at $1.28 in the past 24 hours. The 24-hour trading volume of LQTY/USD has increased and is currently at $17 million, and the market capitalization of the cryptocurrency is $118 million. Liquidity price analysis 1-day chart: LQTY…

    Article 2023年6月1日
  • Senator slams crypto for putting Americans at risk

    TL;DR Breakdown Senator Sherrod Brown raises concerns over the lack of transparency in cryptocurrency disclosures. Brown reaches out to finance and trade leaders, including Treasury Secretary Janet Yellen and SEC Chair Gary Gensler, urging collaboration and strengthened oversight. The senator emphasizes the dangers of diluting America’s high investment standards and warns against minimal disclosure requirements for digital assets. Description While cryptocurrency continues its aggressive surge into mainstream finance, not everyone in the corridors of power is thrilled. Senator Sherrod Brown, representing Ohio, has sounded a clarion call on the clear pitfalls and risks it poses for the ordinary American. A Cry for Clarity in the Crypto Wild West The sweeping tidal wave of crypto … Read more While cryptocurrency continues its aggressive surge into mainstream finance, not everyone in the corridors of power is thrilled. Senator Sherrod Brown, representing Ohio, has sounded a clarion call on the clear pitfalls and risks it poses for the ordinary American. A Cry for Clarity in the Crypto Wild West The sweeping tidal wave of crypto has left regulatory bodies and government officials scrambling…

    Article 2023年9月15日
TOP