U.S. blocks China from getting any of the $52b chip funds raised

TL;DR Breakdown

  • The U.S. Commerce Department releases final rules to restrict semiconductor manufacturing subsidies from benefiting countries like China and Russia.
  • $52.7 billion chip fund established under the “Chips and Science” law is the focus of these rules.
  • Regulations aim to prevent U.S. fund recipients from investing in chip manufacturing or joint ventures in nations of concern.

Description

The rivalry between superpowers is nothing new, and the arena of this competition has once again shifted to technology. With silicon chips driving the next industrial revolution, the U.S. has made a clear statement: China and other nations of concern won’t get their hands on any part of the whopping $52.7 billion chip fund raised … Read more

The rivalry between superpowers is nothing new, and the arena of this competition has once again shifted to technology. With silicon chips driving the next industrial revolution, the U.S. has made a clear statement: China and other nations of concern won’t get their hands on any part of the whopping $52.7 billion chip fund raised under the landmark “Chips and Science” law.

Bit greedy, no? But perhaps not. Let’s take a closer look.

Guardrails in Play: No Chips for Adversaries

In a move that spells caution and protectionism, the U.S. Commerce Department is issuing final rules to keep semiconductor manufacturing subsidies from benefiting nations like China and Russia.

These nations, deemed by the U.S. as posing national security threats, will find it challenging to expand their chip manufacturing capabilities using U.S. funds.

The rules, which were initially proposed back in March, seek to put a solid fence around where and how the semiconductor production funds can be used.

So, companies planning to set up or expand semiconductor manufacturing units in countries listed as concerns will be out of luck. The same goes for those considering joint research or technology licensing projects with entities from these nations.

To further solidify this stance, the department had previously launched new export controls last October, thereby preventing China from accessing specific semiconductor chips made using U.S. equipment. This move was an evident bid to stymie Beijing’s aggressive technological and military growth.

A Cautious Approach: The Details that Matter

According to the U.S. Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo, there’s a palpable pressure to ensure that none of the funds help China or similar countries gain an advantage.

If any funding recipients decide to play a fast one and violate these restrictions, they’ll have to deal with the consequences. The Commerce Department holds the authority to recall any federal awards handed out, making it a risky gambit for any company considering defying the set guidelines.

While there’s urgency in distributing these funds and boosting the U.S.’ semiconductor industry, Raimondo believes in doing things right. Even if it means delays of a few weeks or a month, ensuring compliance and protecting national interests remains the priority.

The newly minted regulation has set some detailed guidelines for funding recipients. They cannot significantly boost their semiconductor manufacturing capabilities in countries listed as concerns for a decade.

While some joint research or technology licensing projects with foreign entities have been restricted, exceptions have been made for international standards, patent licensing, and certain foundry and packaging services.

Furthermore, these rules offer clarity on what constitutes an expansion in the semiconductor manufacturing arena. An increase in cleanroom or other physical spaces or a surge in production capacity of over 5% will be considered a material expansion. Adding new cleanroom spaces or production lines that lead to a facility’s production capacity exceeding 10% is off the cards.

In essence, the U.S. has fortified its approach to ensure that certain semiconductors, crucial for national security, remain within its jurisdiction. As the technology landscape becomes the new battleground, it’s clear the U.S. won’t easily yield ground, especially when it concerns the intricate and essential world of semiconductor chips.

Disclaimer: The information provided is not trading advice. Cryptopolitan.com holds no liability for any investments made based on the information provided on this page. We strongly recommend independent research and/or consultation with a qualified professional before making any investment decision.

文章来源于互联网:U.S. blocks China from getting any of the $52b chip funds raised

Disclaimers:

1. You are solely responsible for your investment decisions and this info is not liable for any losses you may incur.

2. The copyright of this article belongs to the writer, it represents the writer's opinions only, not represents the site's ones. Not financial advice.

Previous 2023年9月23日 17:52
Next 2023年9月23日 19:43

Related articles

  • SEC casts doubt on Coinbase’s compliance despite approving its going public

    TL;DR Breakdown SEC says that Coinbase going public does not represent a “blessing” from it and does not show the company complies with regulations However, questions have come up on why the SEC would allow a non-compliant company to go public in the first place Description The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has claimed in court regarding the Coinbase case that the agency’s decision to approve a company’s S-1 application does not represent a “blessing” from it. Additionally, it does not offer evidence that the company complies with regulations. According to court filings from the pre-motion hearing in the SEC … Read more The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) has claimed in court regarding the Coinbase case that the agency’s decision to approve a company’s S-1 application does not represent a “blessing” from it. Additionally, it does not offer evidence that the company complies with regulations. According to court filings from the pre-motion hearing in the SEC v. Coinbase lawsuit on July 13, the SEC claimed that when it approved Coinbase’s plan to go public in April 2021,…

    Article 2023年7月15日
  • Is the $33 trillion U.S. debt all that bad? Let’s see

    Description The colossal U.S. debt, now hovering at a staggering $33 trillion, has become a defining conversation piece for many fiscal conversations. It’s a number that’s hard to grasp, often cloaked in anxiety, controversy, and divisive opinions. Every fiscal year since the turn of the millennium has witnessed the U.S. spending more than its revenue, forcing … Read more The colossal U.S. debt, now hovering at a staggering $33 trillion, has become a defining conversation piece for many fiscal conversations. It’s a number that’s hard to grasp, often cloaked in anxiety, controversy, and divisive opinions. Every fiscal year since the turn of the millennium has witnessed the U.S. spending more than its revenue, forcing the nation into the corner of borrowing. But is all this borrowing a financial apocalypse in the making, or could there be a silver lining somewhere? Debt: A Necessary Evil or a Useful Tool? Kris Mitchener, a distinguished economist at Santa Clara University’s Leavey School of Business, paints the public debt with a more nuanced brush. Mitchener suggests that borrowing, historically, has been the go-to move…

    Article 2023年9月11日
  • Haru Invest suspends withdrawals due to a service partner issue

    TL;DR Breakdown Haru Invest, a company in South Korea, halts withdrawals to protect investors after a partner defaults.  Haru provides attractive dividend rates ranging from 12% to 25%, with approximately $1 billion in assets. There is so much controversy surrounding the investment firm. Haru Invest, a South Korean digital asset management company, has suspended withdrawals from its system due to an issue with one of its service partners. The decision was made to protect customer funds while a contingency plan was developed. Haru Invest, a company known for offering attractive dividend rates, has faced controversy and speculation surrounding its financial situation and past mergers. Controversy surrounds South Korean asset management firm Haru Invest A South Korean company called Haru Invest, which manages digital assets, has banned withdrawals from its system due to an issue with one of the service partners. In an announcement on June 13, the company stated that the suspension was a difficult decision to protect customer funds until a contingency plan could be devised to address the situation. Important update from Haru Invest. https://t.co/igdTS2DaNp pic.twitter.com/E8mB6PeDQW — Haru…

    Article 2023年6月16日
  • Crypto gaming sector hits record $297 million in investments in July

    TL;DR Breakdown The crypto gaming industry attracted a massive record $297 million investment in July. Fluctuations and the growing momentum in the crypto gaming sector. Description The crypto gaming industry, encompassing games utilizing blockchain-based tokens or NFTs, experienced a remarkable influx of investment last month, securing a collective total of $297 million, according to a collaborative report by DappRadar and the Blockchain Game Alliance. A significant 63% of the funding directed towards the sector in July was allocated to infrastructure development, … Read more The crypto gaming industry, encompassing games utilizing blockchain-based tokens or NFTs, experienced a remarkable influx of investment last month, securing a collective total of $297 million, according to a collaborative report by DappRadar and the Blockchain Game Alliance. A significant 63% of the funding directed towards the sector in July was allocated to infrastructure development, underscoring the industry’s nascent stage of growth. The crypto gaming sector secured $297 million in funding Investors are banking on tools and platforms that will facilitate the emergence of future crypto and NFT-driven games. July’s investment surge stands in stark contrast…

    Article 2023年8月12日
  • Ripple Labs Inc. challenges SEC’s attempt for an interlocutory appeal in landmark case

    TL;DR Breakdown Ripple Labs Inc. and its top executives have strongly opposed the SEC’s attempt for an interlocutory appeal, arguing that the case doesn’t present a “controlling question of law” that would warrant such an appeal. Ripple accuses the SEC of selectively regulating the U.S. crypto industry and questions the agency’s commitment to genuine legal standards. Description In a move that could significantly influence the future of cryptocurrency regulations in the United States, Ripple Labs Inc., along with its top executives Brad Garlinghouse and Christian A. Larsen, has vehemently opposed the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)’s motion for an interlocutory appeal. The case, brought to light by Fox Business reporter Eleanor Terrett, … Read more In a move that could significantly influence the future of cryptocurrency regulations in the United States, Ripple Labs Inc., along with its top executives Brad Garlinghouse and Christian A. Larsen, has vehemently opposed the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC)’s motion for an interlocutory appeal. The case, brought to light by Fox Business reporter Eleanor Terrett, is seen as a watershed moment for the U.S. cryptocurrency…

    Article 2023年9月2日
TOP